Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40011398›Full record

SynthesisJournal of clinical monitoring and computing2025

Electrical impedance tomography for PEEP titration in ARDS patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Carlos Sanchez-Piedra, Begoña Rodríguez-Ortiz-de-Salazar, Oriol Roca, Francisco-Javier Prado-Galbarro, Lilisbeth Perestelo-Perez, Luis-Maria Sanchez-Gomez

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Right ventricular-protective ventilation in acute respiratory distress syndrome: phenotypes, monitoring and ventilatory management.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2026
    Review
  2. The role of mechanical power in lung ventilation for the prevention of ventilator-induced lung injury: a narrative review.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Carlos Sanchez-PiedraHealth Technology Assessment Agency, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, España. carlos.sanchez@isciii.es.ORCID 0000-0001-5420-7347
Begoña Rodríguez-Ortiz-de-SalazarHealth Technology Assessment Agency, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, España.
Oriol RocaServei de Medicina Intensiva, Parc Taulí Hospital Universitari, Institut d'Investigació i Innovació Parc Taulí (I3PT-CERCA), Sabadell, Spain.
Francisco-Javier Prado-GalbarroDepartamento de Investigación, Hospital Infantil de México Federico Gómez, Ciudad de México, México.
Lilisbeth Perestelo-PerezRICAPPS. Red de Investigación en Cronicidad, Atención Primaria y Prevención y Promoción de la Salud, Madrid, Spain.
Luis-Maria Sanchez-GomezHealth Technology Assessment Agency, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, España.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To assess the efficacy of electrical impedance tomography (EIT)-guided positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) titration in improving outcomes for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Randomized controlled trials and observational studies with a control group comparing EIT-guided PEEP titration to other strategies were included. Endpoints analysed included mortality, days of mechanical ventilation (MV), intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS), weaning success rate, barotrauma, driving pressure (∆P), mechanical power (MP), Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score and adverse events. Pooled results were presented as Risk Ratio (RR) for dichotomous outcomes and standardized difference in means (SMD) for continuous outcomes. A total of 4 studies were identified (3 randomized controlled trials and one observational study). All studies were single-center studies (N total = 271 patients). The main limitations were related to potential bias in selecting reported outcomes. EIT-guided PEEP titration was associated with a significant reduction in mortality among critically ill patients with ARDS (RR = 0.64, 95% CI: 0.45-0.91). No significant differences were found in other outcomes. Our findings suggest that EIT may be a valuable tool for PEEP titration in critically ill patients with ARDS. By optimizing lung mechanics, EIT-guided PEEP titration may potentially reduce mortality rates. While larger, multicenter studies are needed to definitively establish the clinical role of EIT in ARDS management, our results provide promising evidence for its potential clinical impact.

Indexed as

Electric ImpedancePositive-Pressure RespirationRespiratory Distress SyndromeTomographyCritical IllnessHumansIntensive Care UnitsLength of StayObservational Studies as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRespiration, ArtificialTreatment OutcomeAcute respiratory distress syndrome, positive end-expiratory pressureCritical careElectrical impedance tomographyMechanical ventilation

Identifiers

PMID40011398
PMCPMC12474599

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.