Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40011390›Full record

ArticleJournal of ultrasound2025

An ultrasound working table as diagnostic tool of temporomandibular joint inflammation.

Serena Guiducci, Maria Angela Bagni, Sara Torracchi, Pamela Bernardini, Marco Maresca, Lorenzo Vanini, Diego Longo, Alessio Frisone, Daniela Melchiorre

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of ultrasound, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Serena GuiducciDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Viale Largo Brambilla 3, 50134, Florence, Italy.
Maria Angela BagniDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Viale Largo Brambilla 3, 50134, Florence, Italy.
Sara TorracchiDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Viale Largo Brambilla 3, 50134, Florence, Italy.
Pamela BernardiniDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Viale Largo Brambilla 3, 50134, Florence, Italy.
Marco MarescaDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Viale Largo Brambilla 3, 50134, Florence, Italy.
Lorenzo VaniniDepartment of Innovative Technologies in Medicine and Dentistry, Università G. D'Annunzio Chieti, Chieti, Italy.
Diego LongoDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Viale Largo Brambilla 3, 50134, Florence, Italy.
Alessio FrisoneDepartment of Innovative Technologies in Medicine and Dentistry, Università G. D'Annunzio Chieti, Chieti, Italy.
Daniela MelchiorreDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Viale Largo Brambilla 3, 50134, Florence, Italy. daniela.melchiorre@unifi.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8510-0304

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the use of ultrasound (US) in identifying the inflammatory or not inflammatory changes in different diseases that involve the temporomandibular joint (TMJ).

methods165 patients [50 Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA), 30 Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA), 15 Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) and 70 Temporomandibular Disorders (TMD)] were studied by US with a linear probe 12-16 MHz (MyLABX8 eXP, ESAOTE S.p.A., Milan, Italy) placed along the axis of the mandibular branch. US results were compared with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

resultsIn TMJ, US identified joint effusion (JE), as well as disc displacement and modifications of the condylar profile. The specificity of US in comparison with MRI was 90.3% for JE, 75.2% for disc displacement, and 48.1% for condylar alterations. The sensitivity of US in comparison with MRI was 92.4% in the assessment of JE, 72% in the assessment of disc displacement, and 53% in the assessment of condylar alterations.

conclusionsUS must be performed to define the inflammatory or not inflammatory changes of TMJ in different diseases adopting a specific working table. Moreover, the resulting disability may induce a significant loss of workdays for short and close periods with consequently high cost for the health care system.

Indexed as

Temporomandibular JointTemporomandibular Joint DisordersAdultAgedFemaleHumansInflammationMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedSensitivity and SpecificityUltrasonographyInflammatory arthritis joint diseasesTemporomandibular disordersTemporo-mandibular jointUltrasound examination

Identifiers

PMID40011390
PMCPMC11947394

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.