Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40011377›Full record

ArticleDrugs - real world outcomes2025

Safety and Effectiveness of Brigatinib in Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase (ALK) Positive Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) in Argentina: A Post-Marketing Surveillance Study.

Claudio Martin, Gabriela Ileana Malcervelli, Gastón Lucas Martinengo, Patricio Levit, Patricio Servienti, Elisa Malaver, Laura Brion, Vanesa Patronella, Andrea Zumárraga, Jose Zarba

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drugs - real world outcomes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04887519 (Post Authorization Study to Monitor Efficacy, Effectiveness and Safety of Brigatinib), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04887519 completednot on this map

Post Authorization Study to Monitor Efficacy, Effectiveness and Safety of Brigatinib (Alunbrig®) in Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase (ALK) Positive Metastatic Non Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) in Argentina

TypeobservationalSponsorTakedaRan2020 to 2023Enrolled39ConditionsCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, Anaplastic Lymphoma KinaseArmsNo Intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Claudio MartinAlexander Fleming, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Gabriela Ileana MalcervelliClinical Oncology Section, Hospital de Oncología Maria Curie, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Gastón Lucas MartinengoInstituto del Cáncer Rosario, Grupo Oroño, Santa Fe, Argentina.
Patricio LevitCEMAC, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Patricio ServientiHospital Gral. de Agudos Dr. Teodoro Álvarez, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Elisa MalaverPharmacovigilance Takeda Argentina S.A., Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Laura BrionMedical Affairs, Takeda Argentina S.A., Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Vanesa PatronellaMedical Affairs, Takeda Argentina S.A., Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Andrea ZumárragaMedical Affairs, Takeda Argentina S.A., Buenos Aires, Argentina. andrea.zumarraga@takeda.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-2580-4306
Jose ZarbaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hospital Zenón Santillán, Tucumán, Argentina.

Funding

Takeda Argentina S.A. Brigatinib-5008
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBrigatinib, a next-generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitor was licensed for the treatment of ALK-positive metastatic non-small cell lung cancer in 2016. However, real-world evidence on the safety and effectiveness of brigatinib in Latin America remains limited.

objectiveThe aim of this study was to assess the safety and effectiveness of brigatinib in the real world in Argentina.

methodsWe conducted a non-interventional cohort study of adult patients (aged ≥  18 years) with a diagnosis of ALK-positive metastatic non-small cell lung cancer not previously treated (first line) or previously treated (second line) with an ALK inhibitor and who received at least one dose of brigatinib between November 2020 and March 2023. The primary outcome was the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events. Secondary outcomes at the 24-week follow-up were the percentage of patients with an overall best objective response rate of complete or partial response; intracranial objective response rate; progression-free survival; and overall survival.

resultsOf the 39 patients included in the study (n = 22 [first line]; n = 17 [second line]), 12 patients (30.7%) experienced treatment-emergent adverse events, with the most frequent being increased levels of transaminases (7.6%), increased level of blood creatine phosphokinase (5%) and hypokalaemia (5%). Most adverse events (85.7%) were mild to moderate. Effectiveness outcomes at 24 weeks in patients treated with brigatinib first line or second line, respectively, were as follows: overall objective response rate: 81.8% and 70.5%; intracranial objective response rate (in patients with brain metastases at baseline): 66.6% and 88.8%; progression-free survival: 93.8% and 82.4%; overall survival: 100% and 87.5%.

conclusionsBrigatinib was demonstrated to be a safe and effective treatment option for ALK-positive metastatic non-small cell lung cancer in routine clinical practice in Argentina. CLINICAL

trial registrationNCT04887519.

Identifiers

PMID40011377
PMCPMC12173969

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.