ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2025
Explained Deep Learning Framework for COVID-19 Detection in Volumetric CT Images Aligned with the British Society of Thoracic Imaging Reporting Guidance: A Pilot Study.
Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- An efficient dual path deep learning framework for COVID-19 classification using lung CT scans with explainable AI.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In March 2020, the British Society of Thoracic Imaging (BSTI) introduced a reporting guidance for COVID-19 detection to streamline standardised reporting and enhance agreement between radiologists. However, most current DL methods do not conform to this guidance. This study introduces a multi-class deep learning (DL) model to identify BSTI COVID-19 categories within CT volumes, classified as 'Classic', 'Probable', 'Indeterminate', or 'Non-COVID'. A total of 56 CT pseudoanonymised images were collected from patients with suspected COVID-19 and annotated by an experienced chest subspecialty radiologist following the BSTI guidance. We evaluated the performance of multiple DL-based models, including three-dimensional (3D) ResNet architectures, pre-trained on the Kinetics-700 video dataset. For better interpretability of the results, our approach incorporates a post-hoc visual explainability feature to highlight the areas of the image most indicative of the COVID-19 category. Our four-class classification DL framework achieves an overall accuracy of 75%. However, the model struggled to detect the 'Indeterminate' COVID-19 group, whose removal significantly improved the model's accuracy to 90%. The proposed explainable multi-classification DL model yields accurate detection of 'Classic', 'Probable', and 'Non-COVID' categories with poor detection ability for 'Indeterminate' COVID-19 cases. These findings are consistent with clinical studies that aimed at validating the BSTI reporting manually amongst consultant radiologists.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.