Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40011330›Full record

ArticleGeneral thoracic and cardiovascular surgery2025

Comparison of postoperative pain between robotic and uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery for anatomic lung resection in patients with stage I lung cancer.

Keita Tokuishi, Jun-Ichi Wakahara, Yuichiro Ueda, So Miyahara, Hiroyasu Nakashima, Yoshiko Masuda, Ryuichi Waseda, Takeshi Shiraishi, Toshihiko Sato

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in General thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Keita TokuishiDepartment of General Thoracic Surgery, St. Mary'S Hospital, 422 Tsubukuhonmachi, Kurume, Fukuoka, 830-8543, Japan. ktoku0220@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-4934-3383
Jun-Ichi WakaharaDepartment of General Thoracic Surgery, Breast and Pediatric Surgery, Fukuoka University School of Medicine, Fukuoka, Japan.
Yuichiro UedaDepartment of General Thoracic Surgery, Breast and Pediatric Surgery, Fukuoka University School of Medicine, Fukuoka, Japan.
So MiyaharaDepartment of General Thoracic Surgery, Breast and Pediatric Surgery, Fukuoka University School of Medicine, Fukuoka, Japan.
Hiroyasu NakashimaDepartment of General Thoracic Surgery, Breast and Pediatric Surgery, Fukuoka University School of Medicine, Fukuoka, Japan.
Yoshiko MasudaDepartment of General Thoracic Surgery, Breast and Pediatric Surgery, Fukuoka University School of Medicine, Fukuoka, Japan.
Ryuichi WasedaDepartment of General Thoracic Surgery, Breast and Pediatric Surgery, Fukuoka University School of Medicine, Fukuoka, Japan.
Takeshi ShiraishiDepartment of General Thoracic Surgery, Breast and Pediatric Surgery, Fukuoka University School of Medicine, Fukuoka, Japan.
Toshihiko SatoDepartment of General Thoracic Surgery, Breast and Pediatric Surgery, Fukuoka University School of Medicine, Fukuoka, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveUniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (U-VATS) and robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) are widely used, minimally invasive procedures. The present study aimed to compare postoperative pain following U-VATS and RATS anatomical lung resection in patients with clinical stage I lung cancer.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of the data from 133 patients with clinical stage I lung cancer who underwent U-VATS (n = 63), four-arm RATS (n = 70) lobectomy, or segmentectomy between August 2020 and August 2023. Early postoperative outcomes, pain scores through postoperative day 7, and duration of postoperative analgesic use 60 days after surgery were compared using propensity score-matched analysis.

resultsIn the propensity score-matched analysis, the U-VATS group had a shorter operative time than the RATS group (160 vs. 202 min, respectively; P < 0.001). However, no significant differences were observed in blood loss, chest tube duration, complications, post operative stay length, or number of dissected lymph nodes and stations. The U-VATS group exhibited significantly lower pain scores than the RATS group throughout the entire postoperative period, particularly on postoperative days 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 7(P = 0.006, 0.044, 0.032, 0.041, 0.007, and 0.024, respectively). The number of patients who used analgesics for at least 2 months was lower in the U-VATS group than in the RATS group (4 [8.2%] vs. 17 [34.0%], respectively; P = 0.002).

conclusionU-VATS anatomical lung resection in patients with clinical stage I lung cancer has less postoperative pain than RATS.

Indexed as

Lung NeoplasmsPneumonectomyPostoperative PainRobotic Surgical ProceduresThoracic Surgery, Video-AssistedAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansJapanMaleMiddle AgedPain ManagementRetrospective StudiesLung cancerPostoperative outcomesPostoperative painRobotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgeryUniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.