Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40011323›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical systems2025

Feature-Based Audiogram Value Estimator (FAVE): Estimating Numerical Thresholds from Scanned Images of Handwritten Audiograms.

Paul G Mayo, Kenneth I Vaden, Lois J Matthews, Judy R Dubno

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical systems, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Paul G MayoDepartment of Hearing and Speech Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, 20742, USA. paulmayo@umd.edu.
Kenneth I VadenDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA.
Lois J MatthewsDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA.
Judy R DubnoDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA.

Funding

SPEECH UNDERSTANDING IN REALISTIC ENVIRONMENTSP50DC000422 · NIDCD · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI DUBNO, JUDY R · 1989 to 2025
$45.3M
South Carolina Clinical & Translational Research Institute (SCTR)UL1TR001450 · NCATS · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI BRADY, KATHLEEN T., FLUME, PATRICK A · 2015 to 2024
$41.1M
COMPARATIVE AND EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY OF HEARINGT32DC000046 · NIDCD · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI Catherine Emily Carr, Matthew J. Goupell · 1994 to 2026
$7.5M
RENOVATION TO SUPPORT SENSORY NEUROSCIENCE RESEARCHC06RR014516 · NCRR · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI RAYMOND, JOHN R · 1999 to 1999
–
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001450NCRR NIH HHS C06 RR014516NIDCD NIH HHS P50 DC000422NIDCD NIH HHS T32 DC000046NIH HHS P50 DC 000422NIH HHS T32 DC 000046
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hearing loss is a public health concern that affects millions of people globally. Clinically, a person's hearing sensitivity is often measured using pure-tone audiometry and visualized as a pure-tone audiogram, a plot of hearing sensitivity as a function of frequency. Digital test equipment allows clinicians to store audiograms as numerical values, though some practices write audiograms by hand and store them as digital images in electronic health records systems. This leaves the numerical values inaccessible to public-health researchers unless manually interpreted. Therefore, this study developed machine-learning models for estimating numerical threshold values from scanned images of handwritten audiograms. Training data were a novel set of 556 handwritten audiograms from a longitudinal cohort study of age-related hearing loss. The models were sliding-window, single-class object detectors based on Aggregate Channel Features, altogether called Feature-based Audiogram Value Estimator or "FAVE". Model accuracy was determined using symbol location accuracy and comparing estimated numerical threshold values to known values from an electronic database. FAVE resulted in an average of 87.0% recall and 96.2% precision for symbol locations. The numerical threshold values were less accurate, with 78.3% of estimations having no error, though threshold estimates were not significantly different from true thresholds. Threshold estimation was more accurate than pre-trained deep learning approaches for the current test set. Future work should consider implementing detectors with similar image channels and identify limitations on symbol and axis tick label detection.

Indexed as

Audiometry, Pure-ToneHearing LossMachine LearningElectronic Health RecordsHumansLongitudinal StudiesAggregate channel featuresAudiogramAudiologyComputer visionEstimateHandwrittenHearing testMachine-learningOtolaryngologyScanThreshold

Identifiers

PMID40011323
PMCPMC12034326

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.