ArticleJournal of biomolecular NMR2025
Local structure propensities in disordered proteins from cross-correlated NMR spin relaxation.
Article in Journal of biomolecular NMR, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Toward a unified framework for determining conformational ensembles of disordered proteins.Nature methods · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Structurally diverse ensembles of intrinsically disordered proteins or regions are difficult to determine, because experimental observables usually report a conformational average. Therefore, in order to infer the underlying distribution, a set of experiments that measure different aspects of the system is necessary. In principle, there exists a set of cross-correlated relaxation (CCR) rates that report on protein backbone geometry in a complementary way. However, CCR rates are hard to interpret, because geometric information is encoded in an ambiguous way and they present themselves as a convolute of both structure and dynamics. Despite these challenges, CCR rates analyzed within a suitable statistical framework are able to identify conformations in structured proteins. In the context of disordered proteins, we find that this approach has to be adjusted to account for local dynamics via including an additional CCR rate. The results of this study show that CCR rates can be used to characterize structure propensities also in disordered proteins. Instead of using an experimental reference structure, we employed computational spectroscopy to calculate CCR rates from molecular dynamics (MD) simulations and subsequently compared the results to conformations as observed directly in the MD trajectory.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.