Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40011318›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of microbiology & biotechnology2025

In vitro validation concept for lyophilized fecal microbiota products with a focus on bacterial viability.

Sara A Sedeek, Fedja Farowski, Stella Youssafi, Anastasia Tsakmaklis, Susanne Brodesser, Madiha M El-Attar, Mohamed Omar Abdelmalek, Maria J G T Vehreschild

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of microbiology & biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sara A SedeekDepartment of Internal Medicine II, Infectious Diseases, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Fedja FarowskiDepartment of Internal Medicine II, Infectious Diseases, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Stella YoussafiFaculty of Medicine, Department I of Internal Medicine, Centre for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf, University of Cologne, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Anastasia TsakmaklisFaculty of Medicine, Department I of Internal Medicine, Centre for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf, University of Cologne, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Susanne BrodesserFaculty of Medicine, Cluster of Excellence Cellular Stress Responses in Aging-associated Diseases (CECAD), University of Cologne, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Madiha M El-AttarDepartment of Tropical Medicine and Gastroenterology, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt.
Mohamed Omar AbdelmalekDepartment of Tropical Medicine and Gastroenterology, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt.
Maria J G T VehreschildDepartment of Internal Medicine II, Infectious Diseases, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany. vehreschild@med.uni-frankfurt.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) effectively treats recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (rCDI), typically administered as a fresh or frozen stool suspension through colonoscopy, nasojejunal tube, or oral capsules. Lyophilized fecal microbiota (LFM) are an alternative to frozen FM products. We aimed to assess whether lyophilization affects bacterial viability and metabolite levels and to develop LFM capsules for clinical use in Germany. Fecal donations from pre-screened volunteers were aliquoted and analyzed through microbial cell counting, bacterial culture, 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing, and bile acid assays. Results showed higher counts of viable bacterial cells and cultured anaerobes in unprocessed stool compared to freshly processed stool (p = 0.012 and p < 0.001, respectively). No significant difference in viable bacterial counts was found between freshly processed (day 0), lyophilized (day 3) and frozen FM (day 3) (p = 0.15), nor between freshly processed (day 0), lyophilized (days 30 and 90) and frozen FM (day 30) (p = 0.07). lyophilization did not significantly impact bile acid and 16S rRNA profiling. Encapsulation of lyophilized powder required fewer capsules (10-14) than frozen capsules (30). LFM products are a practical, viable alternative to frozen and fresh FM products, potentially improving storage and patient acceptance.

Indexed as

BacteriaFecal Microbiota TransplantationFecesMicrobial ViabilityBile Acids and SaltsClostridium InfectionsFreeze DryingGermanyHumansRNA, Ribosomal, 16SBile Acids and SaltsRNA, Ribosomal, 16SBacterial viabilityCapsulesClostridioides difficileFecal microbiota transplantationLyophilization

Identifiers

PMID40011318
PMCPMC11865215

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.