ArticleInsights into imaging2025
Women's perspectives on ultrasound as primary imaging modality for focal breast complaints: a qualitative study.
Article in Insights into imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThe breast ultrasound trial (BUST) demonstrates a high negative predictive value of ultrasound for women presenting with focal breast complaints, suggesting a potential shift from mammography/digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) to ultrasound as a primary imaging modality. This BUST side-study explored women's perspectives on adopting ultrasound as the primary diagnostic tool.
methodsTwenty-nine female BUST participants (mean age = 48.4, SD = 8.3) with benign findings after diagnostic evaluation participated in one of six focus group interviews 18-24 months post-imaging. Discussions were transcribed and analyzed thematically.
resultsFour overarching themes were identified; personal health situation, organization of breast care, effectiveness of imaging, and professionals' attitudes and roles. Participants considered their own health history and complaint type (personal health situation) and discussed eligibility for national screening programs and the costs of both exams (organization of breast care). Opinions varied on the effectiveness of imaging, particularly regarding the importance of detecting additional non-symptomatic findings with mammography/DBT that may be missed by ultrasound. Concerns were also raised about implementing research findings without conclusive scientific evidence. Health professionals' attitudes and roles encompassed the influence of GPs' and radiologists' attitudes and the process of image interpretation.
conclusionThese findings reveal diverse attitudes of women towards ultrasound as a primary modality, warranting caution when transitioning to new clinical standards. Providing comprehensive information about the evidence on the benefits and risks of different imaging modalities is essential, and fostering shared decision-making could enhance acceptance. Offering women the choice of additional imaging, such as mammography/DBT after an initial ultrasound, may balance clinical performance with patient autonomy. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Patients' perspectives on medical procedures are increasingly significant in modern healthcare. Women's perceived barriers and facilitators to diagnostic imaging, shaped by numerous factors, offer healthcare professionals insights beyond pure biomedical approaches, fostering shared decision-making within radiology and other clinical contexts. KEY POINTS: This study explores women's perspectives on breast ultrasound as a primary imaging modality. Attitudes towards an ultrasound-first approach are shaped by internal and external considerations. Considerations are highly informed by emotional responses and lack of knowledge. Insights into women's perspectives inform healthcare professionals and foster shared decision-making within radiology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.