Observational studySurgery today2025
A comparison of the diagnostic ability of 1-mm computed tomography and 3-mm magnetic resonance imaging for detecting lateral pelvic lymph node metastases from rectal cancer.
Observational study in Surgery today, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimThe best modality for evaluating lateral pelvic lymph node (LPLN) metastases from rectal cancer remains unclear. This study compared the diagnostic ability of 1-mm computed tomography (CT) and 3-mm magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in identifying LPLN metastases based on size.
methodsThis observational study analyzed not individual patients but 191 sides from 100 rectal cancer patients without preoperative treatment for whom preoperative CT and MRI and corresponding pathological results for LPLNs were available. A swollen LPLN was defined as an LN with a short-axis size of ≥5 mm on 1-mm CT.
resultsLPLNs were detected significantly more frequently with 1-mm CT than with 3-mm MRI (p < 0.001). Among the 117 sides without swollen LPLNs, metastasis was observed in 1.7% of patients. In contrast, LPLN metastasis was confirmed in 28.4% of 74 sides with swollen LPLNs. In the evaluation of swollen LPLNs, 3-mm MRI yielded a 34% improvement in the diagnostic performance of LPLN metastasis over 1-mm CT (categorical net reclassification improvement: 0.341, p = 0.045).
conclusionsIn conclusion, 1-mm CT should be performed preoperatively to evaluate LPLNs. Further evaluations can be omitted in the absence of swollen LPLNs. In patients with swollen LPLNs, a careful assessment of LPLN metastasis should be conducted via additional MRI, even in early T-stage tumors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40011277What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.