ArticleUrologic oncology2025
Characterization of metabolic and imaging profiles in the diagnosis of succinate dehydrogenase- related hereditary pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas.
Article in Urologic oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeHereditary pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas can be associated with mutations in the mitochondrial enzyme succinate dehydrogenase. Due to their heterogenous clinical presentation, no clear universal screening guidelines are currently available. We sought to examine the utility of metabolic testing and imaging in diagnosing hereditary pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas. MATERIALS AND
methodsOur retrospective study included patients with confirmed familial succinate dehydrogenase mutations and histologically proven pheochromocytomas/paragangliomas or with suggestive metabolic and imaging features. We extracted information on age, race, sex, tumor size, tumor location, presence of metastatic disease and other succinate dehydrogenase-associated manifestations, urine and plasma metabolic testing, and diagnostic imaging. Patients who lacked any diagnostic information were excluded.
resultsOur cohort consisted of 9 patients with 13 tumor occurrences from 2003 to 2023. The average age at diagnosis was 31.7 years with a 2.9 cm average tumor size. Three patients developed metastatic disease. Five tumors (38.5%) were biochemically silent, with all tumors detected on imaging. Most of the remaining tumors had a noradrenergic profile, with positive norepinephrine and normetanephrine in plasma and urine. I-123 MIBG was the least sensitive (50%) imaging modality, and Ga-68 DOTATATE PET/CT was the most sensitive (100%). 10 (76.9%) tumors were treated with surgical resection; all metabolic results were subsequently negative, except in patients with metastatic disease.
conclusionsOur investigation adds to the current literature on diagnosing hereditary pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas. We highlight the importance of multimodal screening that consists of both imaging and metabolic screening, especially given the prevalence of biochemically silent tumors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.