Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40011174›Full record

ArticleThe journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease2025

Patient eligibility for amyloid-targeting immunotherapies in Alzheimer's disease.

Jurij Rosen, Frank Jessen

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Cost-effectiveness of testing biofluid biomarkers to diagnose Alzheimer's disease: a systematic review.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. The evolving landscape of amyloid-targeting therapies in Alzheimer's disease: progress and challenges.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jurij RosenDepartment of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Frank JessenDepartment of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany; Excellence Cluster on Cellular Stress Responses in Aging-Associated Diseases (CECAD), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany; German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Bonn, Germany. Electronic address: frank.jessen@uk-koeln.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAmyloid beta (Aβ) targeting immunotherapies have evolved as promising treatment options for patients with early symptomatic Alzheimer's disease (AD). Understanding how eligibilty criteria impact on the number of patients potentially qualifying for treatment is of high relevance for designing diagnostic workflows in clinical practice and for estimating required ressources and costs.

objectivesWe aimed at estimating the number of potentially eligible patients for treatment with the Aβ targeting antibodies aducanumab, lecanemab and donanemab in a specialized center real-world sample by the applying the phase 3 clinical trial and the appropriate use recommendations (AUR) inclusion and exclusion criteria to the data set. The post-mortem report was used for defining amyloid positivity and the presence of AD pathology in this study.

designRetrospective, descriptive study.

settingThe multicenter National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center-Uniform Data Set (NACC-UDS) and Neuropathology Data Set (NACCNP).

participantsWe included all 3,343 participants of the NACC dataset with available post-mortem pathology reports. MEASUREMENTS/

results887 participants were potential candidates for anti-Aβ immunotherapy as they presented with amnestic mild cognitive impairment or mild dementia and the clinical diagnosis of AD (amnestic AD syndrome). Applying the criterion of amyloid positivity (post mortem report) and the clinical trial inclusion and exclusion criteria to this sample resulted in 83 (9 %), 275 (31 %), and 172 (19 %) participants eligible for treatment with aducanumab, lecanemab, and donanemab, respectively. Applying the criteria of the AUR resulted in 242 (27 %) and 266 (30 %) participants eligible for treatment with aducanumab or lecanemab, respectively. The eligible participant groups for each antibody showed partial, but not full overlap. Co-pathologies were common.

conclusionsThe number of eligible participants varies between the different antibodies and the selected groups only partly overlap, indicating partly different groups of eligible participants for each antibody. Since not all inclusion and exclusion criteria can be extracted from the NACC-UDS dataset, the real number of eligible patients will be smaller.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseAmyloid beta-PeptidesAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedImmunotherapyPatient SelectionAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleRetrospective StudiesaducanumabAmyloid beta-PeptidesAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAducanumabAlzheimer's disease neuropathological changesDonanemabLecanemab

Identifiers

PMID40011174
PMCPMC12184045

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.