Trial reportBritish journal of sports medicine2025
Effectiveness of reducing tendon compression in the rehabilitation of insertional Achilles tendinopathy: a randomised clinical trial.
Trial report in British journal of sports medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Effectiveness of Reducing Tendon Compression in the Treatment of Insertional Achilles Tendinopathy: a Randomised Clinical Trial
Augmenting Standard Rehabilitation With Blood Flow Restriction for Chronic Achilles Tendinopathy: Randomized Clinical Control Trial
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Exercise parameters to consider for Achilles tendinopathy: a modified Delphi study with international experts.British journal of sports medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo assess the effectiveness of low tendon compression rehabilitation (LTCR) versus high tendon compression rehabilitation (HTCR) for treating patients with insertional Achilles tendinopathy.
methodsIn an investigator-blinded, stratified randomised trial, 42 sport-active patients (30 males and 12 females; age 45.8±8.2 years) with chronic (> 3 months) insertional Achilles tendinopathy were allocated in a 1:1 ratio to receive LTCR or HTCR. Both rehabilitation protocols consisted of a progressive 4-stage tendon-loading programme, including isometric, isotonic, energy-storage and release and sport-specific exercises. The LTCR programme was designed to control Achilles tendon compression by limiting ankle dorsiflexion during exercise, eliminating calf stretching and incorporating heel lifts. The primary outcome was the Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment-Achilles (VISA-A) score at 12 and 24 weeks, which measures tendon pain and function and was analysed on an intention-to-treat basis using a linear mixed model. Significance was accepted when p<0.05.
results20 patients were randomised to the LTCR group and 22 to the HTCR group. Improvement in VISA-A score was significantly greater for LTCR compared with HTCR after 12 weeks (LTCR=24.4; HTCR=12.2; mean between-group difference=12.9 (95% CI: 6.2 to 19.6); p<0.001) and after 24 weeks (LTCR=29.0; HTCR=19.3; mean between-group difference=10.4 (95% CI: 3.7 to 17.1); p<0.001). These differences exceeded the minimal clinically important difference of 10.
conclusionsIn sport-active patients with insertional Achilles tendinopathy, LTCR was more effective than HTCR in improving tendon pain and function at 12 and 24 weeks. Consequently, LTCR should be considered in the treatment of insertional Achilles tendinopathy. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov (ID: NCT05456620).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.