Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40010978›Full record

ArticleIn vivo (Athens, Greece)

Participant Perspectives on Pulse-Echo Ultrasound Technology

Abdulkareem Algahtani, Mohammed Asiri, Kinan Mokbel, Robert Meertens, Jon Fulford, William David Strain, Karen Knapp

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in In vivo (Athens, Greece). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Abdulkareem AlgahtaniDepartment of Health and Care Professions, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, U.K.; aa1070@exeter.ac.uk.
Mohammed AsiriDepartment of Health and Care Professions, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, U.K.
Kinan MokbelDepartment of Health and Care Professions, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, U.K.
Robert MeertensDepartment of Health and Care Professions, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, U.K.
Jon FulfordDepartment of Health and Care Professions, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, U.K.
William David StrainDepartment of Clinical and Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, U.K.
Karen KnappDepartment of Health and Care Professions, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, U.K.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

aimOsteoporosis is a global health concern causing severe fractures, and timely diagnosis with thorough bone assessment is crucial for effective management. Diagnostic tools such as Bindex PATIENTS AND

methodsTwo diagnostic imaging tools were used in this comparative study: Bindex

resultsDespite minor discomfort associated with the gel application, Bindex

conclusionIn addition to enhancing diagnostic workflows, we demonstrated that Bindex

Indexed as

Absorptiometry, PhotonOsteoporosisAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient SatisfactionSurveys and QuestionnairesUltrasonographyBindex®Bone healthDEXAdual energy X-ray absorptiometryDXAosteoporosispatient acceptabilitypatient comfortquantitative ultrasoundQUS

Identifiers

PMID40010978
PMCPMC11884438

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.