Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40010850›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurointerventional surgery2026

Rising tide of middle meningeal artery embolization for chronic subdural hematomas: current volumes and future growth compared with cerebral aneurysm and stroke interventions.

Ansaar T Rai, Paul S Link, Dhairya A Lakhani

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurointerventional surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Cost comparison of liquid versus particulate embolic agents for middle meningeal artery embolization in chronic subdural hematoma.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ansaar T RaiInterventional Neuroradiology, West Virginia University Rockefeller Neuroscience Institute, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA ansaar.rai@hsc.wvu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9864-4805
Paul S LinkPD Link Consulting, Phoenix, West Virginia, USA.
Dhairya A LakhaniRockefeller Neuroscience Institute, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7577-1887

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo estimate the current number of middle meningeal artery embolization (MMAE) procedures for subdural hematomas (SDH) and project growth compared with endovascular treatments for cerebral aneurysms and acute ischemic stroke (AIS).

methodsEstimates of SDH admissions were obtained from the National Inpatient Sample and Medicare Inpatient 100% Standard Analytic Files for 2019-23. MMAE volumes (2019-23) were estimated by cross referencing international classification of diseases, 10th revision, clinical modification (ICD-10 CM) codes for non-acute, non-traumatic SDH with ICD-10 procedure coding system (ICD-10 PCS) codes for surgical and endovascular interventions during the same admission to approximate MMAE volumes. These estimates were compared with volumes of endovascular cerebral aneurysm and AIS treatments, with projections based on historical growth rates.

resultsMMAE procedures increased significantly, from 4014 in 2019 to 20 836 in 2023, representing a 51% compound annual growth rate (CAGR). In comparison, endovascular aneurysm treatments grew from 34 754 to 42 491 (5% CAGR) and AIS procedures from 34 451 to 44 822 (7% CAGR). In the next 5 years, MMAE is projected to surpass other neurovascular procedures, with an estimated 79 483 procedures, compared with 79 405 for AIS and 56 942 for aneurysms, by 2029. Annual SDH admissions remained steady at just over 200 000 from 2019 to 2022, with most (~66%) managed medically. Only an estimated 2% of SDH admissions received an MMAE procedure in 2019, rising to 8% in 2022.

conclusionMMAE procedures have seen rapid adoption and may become the dominant neurovascular intervention, with potential implications for healthcare infrastructure and workforce planning.

Indexed as

Embolization, TherapeuticHematoma, Subdural, ChronicIntracranial AneurysmIschemic StrokeMeningeal ArteriesStrokeAgedEndovascular ProceduresFemaleHumansMaleUnited StatesEmbolicMeningesStatistics

Identifiers

PMID40010850
PMCPMC12911627

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.