Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40010844›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Developing patient-reported experience measures to evaluate an Emergency Department Outreach Programme for people experiencing homelessness in Toronto, Canada: a community-based participatory research study protocol.

Sarah Xiao, Curtis Handford, Andrew Pinto, Carolyn Snider

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sarah XiaoThe Nethersole School of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong sarahxiao@cuhk.edu.hk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1064-1958
Curtis HandfordDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Andrew PintoMAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Carolyn SniderMAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPeople experiencing homelessness (PEH) have diverse and complex health and social needs and experience significant barriers to accessing support. As a result, PEH often use the emergency department (ED) for their unmet health and social needs. To address these challenges, the ED Outreach Programme at St. Michael's Hospital was developed with community partners within the Downtown East Toronto Ontario Health Team in Toronto, Canada. PEH presenting in the ED are connected to an outreach worker to identify immediate needs for a safe discharge and to access health and social supports in the community. Following discharge, the outreach worker continues to maintain contact with clients to ensure continuity of care and assists with the coordination, navigation and follow-up of healthcare and community services.

methodsA three-phase community-based participatory research (CBPR) study will be conducted to evaluate patient experience in the ED Outreach Programme. Phase 1 involves conducting interviews with clients and staff/providers to understand their experiences with the programme and identify patient experience domains, constructs and measures. In Phase 2, programme clients, staff/providers and partners with lived experience co-design a set of patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) through focus groups. In Phase 3, the PREMs are pilot-tested to ensure their applicability and utility in the clinical setting. Central to CBPR principles, shared leadership and ownership of the project are facilitated by engaging and empowering community members. This study will contribute to new knowledge of building partnerships with PEH and marginalised communities in healthcare research, evaluation and quality improvement, particularly in developing PREMs. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has been approved by the Unity Health Toronto Research Ethics Board (REB#21-315). Findings will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals, conferences and forums, as well as through collaborating with partners with lived experience, community agencies and government bodies.

Indexed as

Community-Institutional RelationsEmergency Service, HospitalIll-Housed PersonsPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresCommunity-Based Participatory ResearchHumansOntarioProgram EvaluationResearch DesignCommunity-Based Participatory ResearchHealth EquityHealth ServicesProtocols & guidelinesQuality in health care

Identifiers

PMID40010844
PMCPMC11865722

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.