Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40010810›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Design and methods of the research unit 5187 PREACT (towards precision psychotherapy for non-respondent patients: from signatures to predictions to clinical utility) - a study protocol for a multicentre observational study in outpatient clinics.

Till Langhammer, Chantal Unterfeld, Felix Blankenburg, Susanne Erk, Lydia Fehm, John-Dylan Haynes, Stephan Heinzel, Kevin Hilbert, Frank Jacobi, Norbert Kathmann and 6 more

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Till LanghammerDepartment of Psychology, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany till.langhammer@hu-berlin.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6729-956X
Chantal UnterfeldDepartment of Psychology, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Felix BlankenburgNeurocomputation and Neuroimaging Unit, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Susanne ErkCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Lydia FehmDepartment of Psychology, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
John-Dylan HaynesCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Stephan HeinzelDepartment of Educational Sciences and Psychology, TU Dortmund University, Dortmund, Germany.
Kevin HilbertDepartment of Psychology, HMU Health and Medical University Erfurt GmbH, Erfurt, Germany.
Frank JacobiPsychologische Hochschule Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Norbert KathmannDepartment of Psychology, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Christine KnaevelsrudClinical Psychology Intervention, Department of Education and Psychology, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Babette RennebergGerman Center for Mental Health (DZPG), Berlin-Potsdam Partner Site, Berlin, Germany.
Kerstin RitterCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Nikola StenzelPsychologische Hochschule Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Henrik WalterCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Ulrike LuekenDepartment of Psychology, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1564-4012

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) works-but not equally well for all patients. Less than 50% of patients with internalising disorders achieve clinically meaningful improvement, with negative consequences for patients and healthcare systems. The research unit (RU) 5187 seeks to improve this situation by an in-depth investigation of the phenomenon of treatment non-response (TNR) to CBT. We aim to identify bio-behavioural signatures associated with TNR, develop predictive models applicable to individual patients and enhance the utility of predictive analytics by collecting a naturalistic cohort with high ecological validity for the outpatient sector. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The RU is composed of nine subprojects (SPs), spanning from clinical, machine learning and neuroimaging science and service projects to particular research questions on psychological, electrophysiological/autonomic, digital and neural signatures of TNR. The clinical study SP 1 comprises a four-centre, prospective-longitudinal observational trial where we recruit a cohort of 585 patients with a wide range of internalising disorders (specific phobia, social anxiety disorder, panic disorder, agoraphobia, generalised anxiety disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, and unipolar depressive disorders) using minimal exclusion criteria. Our experimental focus lies on emotion (dys)-regulation as a putative key mechanism of CBT and TNR. We use state-of-the-art machine learning methods to achieve single-patient predictions, incorporating pretrained convolutional neural networks for high-dimensional neuroimaging data and multiple kernel learning to integrate information from various modalities. The RU aims to advance precision psychotherapy by identifying emotion regulation-based biobehavioural markers of TNR, setting up a multilevel assessment for optimal predictors and using an ecologically valid sample to apply findings in diverse clinical settings, thereby addressing the needs of vulnerable patients. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has received ethical approval from the Institutional Ethics Committee of the Department of Psychology at Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (approval no. 2021-01) and the Ethics Committee of Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin (approval no. EA1/186/22).Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals and presentations at national and international conferences. Deidentified data and analysis scripts will be made available to researchers within the RU via a secure server, in line with ethical guidelines and participant consent. In compliance with European and German data protection regulations, patient data will not be publicly available through open science frameworks but may be shared with external researchers on reasonable request and under appropriate data protection agreements. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: DRKS00030915.

Indexed as

Cognitive Behavioral TherapyPrecision MedicineAmbulatory Care FacilitiesHumansLongitudinal StudiesMachine LearningMulticenter Studies as TopicObservational Studies as TopicProspective StudiesResearch DesignMachine LearningMENTAL HEALTHMethodsPSYCHIATRYPUBLIC HEALTH

Identifiers

PMID40010810
PMCPMC11865781

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.