Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40010772›Full record

ArticleJournal for immunotherapy of cancer2025

Tumor-specific CD8

Elizabeth M Zawidzka, Luca Biavati, Amy Thomas, Claudio Zanettini, Luigi Marchionni, Robert Leone, Ivan Borrello

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal for immunotherapy of cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Elizabeth M ZawidzkaBloomberg Kimmel Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, Johns Hopkins Medicine School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Luca BiavatiBloomberg Kimmel Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, Johns Hopkins Medicine School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Amy ThomasBloomberg Kimmel Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, Johns Hopkins Medicine School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Claudio ZanettiniWeill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA.
Luigi MarchionniWeill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA.
Robert LeoneBloomberg Kimmel Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, Johns Hopkins Medicine School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1664-0075
Ivan BorrelloBloomberg Kimmel Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, Johns Hopkins Medicine School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA iborrello@tgmg.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7316-8862

Funding

Translational Research Central ServicesP30CA006973 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI WILLIAM George NELSON · 1985 to 2026
$208.6M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA006973
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImmunotherapy is now an integral aspect of cancer therapy. Strategies employing adoptive cell therapy (ACT) have seen the establishment of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cells using peripheral blood lymphocytes as well as tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) with significant clinical results. The bone marrow (BM) is an immunological niche housing T cells with specificity for previously encountered antigens, including tumor-associated antigens from certain solid cancers. This study sought to improve our understanding of tumor-specific BM T cells in the context of solid tumors by comparing them with TILs, and to assess whether there is a rationale for using the BM as a source of T cells for ACT against solid malignancies.

methodsWe used the murine B16 melanoma model examining both the endogenous OVA-specific T cell response using an OVA-specific tetramer or examining the OVA-specific response with OVA-specific transgenic CD8+ (OT-1) T cells. Specifically, we compared baseline intrinsic properties of TILs or BM T cells from tumor-bearing mice and their changes following adoptive transfer in the tumor and bone marrow (as well as other compartments when indicated).

resultsIn tumor-bearing mice, endogenous tumor-specific T cells could be detected in the BM early in the course of tumor progression and possessed a more stem-cell-like and memory phenotype in an unsupervised cluster analysis compared with TILs which appeared more exhausted. The BM and tumor microenvironments significantly impact the fate of T cells. Naïve OT-1 transferred T cells acquired an exhausted phenotype in the tumor but maintained a more memory-like phenotype in the BM with tumor progression. Importantly, in a competitive transfer experiment, BM T cells infiltrated the tumor more efficiently than TILs, displayed a higher polyfunctionality with interleukin-2, interferon-γ, tumor necrosis factor-α production and showed greater persistence compared with TILs.

conclusionsT cells from the BM appear superior to TILs as a source of cells for cellular therapy. They possess a memory-enriched phenotype and exhibit improved effector function, greater persistence within a tumor-bearing host, and the capacity for increased tumor infiltration. These data provide a foundation for further exploring the BM as a source of tumor-specific T cells for ACT in solid malignancies.

Indexed as

Bone MarrowBone Marrow CellsCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesImmunotherapy, AdoptiveLymphocytes, Tumor-InfiltratingMelanoma, ExperimentalAnimalsCell Line, TumorMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMice, TransgenicAdoptive cell therapy - ACTTumor infiltrating lymphocyte - TIL

Identifiers

PMID40010772
PMCPMC11865787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.