Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40010692›Full record

SynthesisThe American journal of clinical nutrition2025

Dietary patterns and colorectal cancer risk: Global Cancer Update Programme (CUP Global) systematic literature review.

Anne Hy Chu, Kehuan Lin, Helen Croker, Sarah Kefyalew, Nerea Becerra-Tomás, Laure Dossus, Esther M González-Gil, Nahid Ahmadi, Yikyung Park, John Krebs and 10 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The American journal of clinical nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. The intersection of colorectal cancer and cardiovascular disease: shared mechanisms and clinical implications.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Emerging trends in the global burden of colorectal cancer.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2026
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Combination Therapy Using Heat-KilledIranian journal of biotechnology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Anne Hy ChuDepartment of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States.
Kehuan LinDepartment of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States.
Helen CrokerWorld Cancer Research Fund International, London, United Kingdom.
Sarah KefyalewWorld Cancer Research Fund International, London, United Kingdom.
Nerea Becerra-TomásDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Laure DossusEvidence Synthesis and Classification Branch, International Agency for Research on Cancer, World Health Organization, Lyon, France.
Esther M González-GilEvidence Synthesis and Classification Branch, International Agency for Research on Cancer, World Health Organization, Lyon, France.
Nahid AhmadiEvidence Synthesis and Classification Branch, International Agency for Research on Cancer, World Health Organization, Lyon, France.
Yikyung ParkDepartment of Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, United States.
John KrebsDepartment of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Matty P WeijenbergDepartment of Epidemiology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Monica L BaskinUPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
Ellen CopsonCancer Sciences Academic Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Sarah J LewisDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Jacob C SeidellFaculty of Science, Department of Health Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Rajiv ChowdhuryDepartment of Global Health, Florida International University, Miami, FL, United States.
Lynette HillWorld Cancer Research Fund International, London, United Kingdom.
Doris Sm ChanDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Dong Hoon LeeDepartment of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States; Department of Sport Industry Studies, Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea. Electronic address: dhlee@yonsei.ac.kr.
Edward L GiovannucciDepartment of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States; Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States. Electronic address: egiovann@hsph.harvard.edu.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe 2018 World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research Third Expert Report, including studies up to 2015, determined limited-no conclusion evidence on dietary patterns and colorectal cancer (CRC) risk due to insufficient data and varying pattern definitions.

objectivesThis updated review synthesized literature on dietary patterns and CRC risk/mortality.

methodsPubMed and Embase were searched through 31 March, 2023, for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and prospective cohort studies on adulthood dietary patterns. Patterns were categorized by derivation method: a priori, a posteriori, or hybrid, and were then descriptively reviewed in relation to the primary outcomes: CRC risk or mortality. The Global Cancer Update Programme Expert Committee and Expert Panel independently graded the evidence on the likelihood of causality using predefined criteria.

resultsThirty-two dietary scores from 53 observational studies and 3 RCTs were reviewed. Limited-suggestive evidence was concluded for higher alignment with a priori-derived patterns: Mediterranean, healthful plant-based index, Healthy Eating Index (HEI)/alternate HEI, and Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH), in relation to lower CRC risk. Common features across these diets included high plant-based food intake and limited red/processed meat. Hybrid-derived patterns: the empirical dietary index for hyperinsulinemia (EDIH) and the empirical dietary inflammatory pattern (EDIP), showed strong-probable evidence for increased CRC risk. Evidence for a priori-derived low-fat dietary interventions and a posteriori-derived patterns was graded as limited-no conclusion. By cancer subsite, higher alignment with Mediterranean diet showed limited-suggestive evidence for lower rectal cancer risk, and that with HEI/alternate HEI and DASH showed limited-suggestive evidence for lower colon and rectal cancer risks. EDIH and EDIP showed strong-probable evidence for increased colon cancer risks. All exposure-mortality pairs and other pattern-outcome associations were graded as limited-no conclusion.

conclusionsThis review highlights the role of dietary patterns in CRC risk/mortality, providing insights for future research and public health strategies. This review was registered at PROSPERO as CRD42022324327 (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42022324327).

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsDietFeeding BehaviorHumansRisk Factorsadultcolorectal cancersdietary patternsepidemiologyincidencesmortalitiesprospective studiespublic healthrandomized controlled trialreview

Identifiers

PMID40010692
PMCPMC12107496

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.