ArticlePhysiology & behavior2025
Comparison of Sprague Dawley with Long Evans rats on a battery of widely used neurobehavioral tests.
Article in Physiology & behavior, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Genetic knockout (KO) models are valuable tools for understanding biological functions and disease mechanisms. KO models in rats have fallen behind those in mice which limits advances in areas where rats have advantages because they can perform more complex cognitive tasks. Two widely used rat strains are Sprague Dawley (SD) and Long Evans (LE). Creating conditional KO models requires crossing Floxed and Cre lines with the constructs of interest but if they are on different genetic backgrounds, offspring will differ not only on the targeted gene but on genes of the differing background strains. We evaluated strain differences in SD and LE rats for behaviors that included: open-field locomotor activity in familiar and novel contexts, acoustic and tactile startle, egocentric and allocentric learning and memory, conditioned freezing, and working memory. Strain differences were found on open-field activity, startle prepulse inhibition, swimming, Cincinnati water maze (CWM), conditioned freezing, and 72 h home-cage activity. However, in the Morris water maze (MWM), performance was comparable between strains during acquisition and reversal, with LE rats performing slightly better in a third, shift phase with the platform in a third location. These data provide information on similarities and differences between SD and LE rats that may be useful to know when these strains are used to create conditional KO models or in regulatory safety studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.