Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40010534›Full record

ArticlePhysiology & behavior2025

Comparison of Sprague Dawley with Long Evans rats on a battery of widely used neurobehavioral tests.

Kimaya R Raje, Michael T Williams, Charles V Vorhees

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Physiology & behavior, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kimaya R RajeMedical Scientist Training Program, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH 45267, USA; Neuroscience Graduate Program, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH 45267, USA.
Michael T WilliamsNeuroscience Graduate Program, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH 45267, USA; Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine and Division of Neurology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USA.
Charles V VorheesNeuroscience Graduate Program, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH 45267, USA; Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine and Division of Neurology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USA. Electronic address: Charles.vorhees@cchmc.org.

Funding

REPRODUCTIVE AND DEVELOPMENTAL TOXICOLOGY RESEARCHP30ES006096 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI PINNEY, SUSAN MENGEL · 1992 to 2022
$35.4M
Gene-pesticide interactions and ADHDR01ES032270 · NIEHS · CINCINNATI CHILDRENS HOSP MED CTR · PI VORHEES, CHARLES V, WILLIAMS, MICHAEL T · 2020 to 2024
$2.2M
NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES006096NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES032270
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetic knockout (KO) models are valuable tools for understanding biological functions and disease mechanisms. KO models in rats have fallen behind those in mice which limits advances in areas where rats have advantages because they can perform more complex cognitive tasks. Two widely used rat strains are Sprague Dawley (SD) and Long Evans (LE). Creating conditional KO models requires crossing Floxed and Cre lines with the constructs of interest but if they are on different genetic backgrounds, offspring will differ not only on the targeted gene but on genes of the differing background strains. We evaluated strain differences in SD and LE rats for behaviors that included: open-field locomotor activity in familiar and novel contexts, acoustic and tactile startle, egocentric and allocentric learning and memory, conditioned freezing, and working memory. Strain differences were found on open-field activity, startle prepulse inhibition, swimming, Cincinnati water maze (CWM), conditioned freezing, and 72 h home-cage activity. However, in the Morris water maze (MWM), performance was comparable between strains during acquisition and reversal, with LE rats performing slightly better in a third, shift phase with the platform in a third location. These data provide information on similarities and differences between SD and LE rats that may be useful to know when these strains are used to create conditional KO models or in regulatory safety studies.

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalAnimalsMaleMaze LearningMemory, Short-TermMotor ActivityPrepulse InhibitionRatsRats, Long-EvansRats, Sprague-DawleyReflex, StartleSpecies SpecificityConditioned freezingLearning and memoryOpen-fieldPrepulse inhibitionRat strain comparisonsStartle

Identifiers

PMID40010534
PMCPMC11998991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.