ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2025
The avian respiratory system: implications for anaesthesia.
Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Biology of the avian respiratory system: development, evolutionary morphology, function and clinical considerations.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Anaesthesia is not a natural state for any animal, including birds. The unique anatomic and physiological attributes of the class Aves that have made it possible for birds to inhabit every continent on this planet and to live in a variety of environments, some considered challenging if not inhospitable to mammals, pose challenges to their anaesthetic management. Indeed, it is more challenging than the anaesthetic management of mammals, a reality substantiated by the fact that the risk of anaesthesia-related death of birds is up to 20 times higher than for dogs and cats. This article highlights those anatomic (respiratory system, renal-portal system), physiological (gas exchange, respiratory control mechanisms in respiratory brainstem and peripheral chemoreceptor areas, including intrapulmonary chemoreceptors) and pharmacological attributes (pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics) that make anaesthetic management, both inhalant and injectable anaesthesia, of birds challenging, and how those challenges are managed.This article is part of the theme issue 'The biology of the avian respiratory system'.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.