Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40010385›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2025

Respiratory contributions to birdsong-evolutionary considerations and open questions.

Franz Goller

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Biology of the avian respiratory system: development, evolutionary morphology, function and clinical considerations.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Franz GollerInstitute for Integrative Cell Biology and Physiology, University of Münster, Münster 48149, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5333-1987

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Respiration plays a central role in avian vocal behaviour by providing the airstream that induces vibration of vocal folds. In this role, respiratory movements dictate the coarse temporal pattern of song, while simultaneously fulfilling its vital functions. Whereas these aspects have been investigated in oscines, little information exists in other taxa. Broad taxonomic information is, however, necessary for addressing questions regarding evolutionary specializations of the respiratory system. Acoustic recordings of unstudied taxa suggest that rapid action by respiratory muscles is a basal trait within birds. In addition to controlling the timing of vocalization, respiratory activity also influences acoustic features such as sound amplitude and frequency. The latter is more strongly influenced by respiratory driving pressure in non-vocal learners. Singing, as a highly dynamic respiratory activity presents an opportunity for studying detailed ventilation patterns and thus could give insight into the basic control of airflow in the avian lung-air sac system. Although we have learned many details of how respiratory control is tied into cortical song control, many open questions remain. Control of respiratory pacemaker circuitry by upstream vocal control centres, respiratory input in initiation of vocalization and the use of online feedback from the respiratory system are all incompletely understood.This article is part of the theme issue 'The biology of the avian respiratory system'.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionBirdsRespirationVocalization, AnimalAnimalsbirdsongenergeticsfeedback controlrespirationrhythmventilation

Identifiers

PMID40010385
PMCPMC11864833

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.