ArticleInternational journal of surgery case reports2025
Management and functional outcomes of a pipkin type II fracture: A case report.
Article in International journal of surgery case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionFemoral head (Pipkin) fractures are rare injuries typically caused by high-energy trauma. Classified into four types, their management remains debated, particularly for Pipkin type II fractures. This case report provides insights into surgical treatment, rehabilitation, and associated complications. CASE PRESENTATION: A 22-year-old male sustained a Pipkin type II femoral head fracture from a dashboard injury in a car accident. He presented with a posterior hip dislocation and a fracture involving the weight-bearing surface. Closed reduction was performed within 40 min, followed by open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) using two Herbert screws via an anterior approach. The patient was discharged after three days and began structured rehabilitation. At six months, he showed significant functional recovery with minimal restrictions. DISCUSSION: The management of Pipkin type II fractures remains controversial, particularly regarding fragment fixation versus excision. Early surgical intervention and stable fixation are key to reducing complications such as avascular necrosis (AVN) and post-traumatic arthritis. In this case, ORIF with early rehabilitation, including gradual weight-bearing and range of motion exercises, contributed to a favorable outcome.
conclusionPrompt surgical intervention and a structured rehabilitation program are essential for optimal recovery in Pipkin type II fractures. This case highlights the importance of individualized treatment strategies and adds to the growing literature on managing this rare injury.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.