ReviewCurrent opinion in neurobiology2025
Timing neural development and regeneration.
Review in Current opinion in neurobiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Context-Dependent Regulation of Microglial Metabolic and Immune States via IL-3/CD123 Signaling: Implications for Glial Crosstalk and Cognitive Impairment.Molecular neurobiology · 2026Review
- Evidence for chronological diversification of spinal neuron subtypes by a shared sequence of transcription factors.Science advances · 2026Article
- Hunchback functions in the postmitotic larval MDN to restrict axon outgrowth, synapse formation, and backward locomotion.Genes & development · 2026Article
- Defective Neural Stem and Progenitor Cell Proliferation in Neurodevelopmental Disorders.Journal of developmental biology · 2025Review
- Decoding neuronal diversity: Mechanisms governing neural cell fate in Drosophila.Current opinion in neurobiology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Regulation of neural progenitor temporal identity is critical to control the chronological order of cell birth and generation of cell diversity in the developing central nervous system (CNS). Single-cell RNA sequencing studies have identified transcriptionally distinct early and late temporal identity states in mammalian neural progenitors in multiple CNS regions. This review discusses recent advances in understanding the mechanisms underlying regulation of temporal identity in mammalian neural progenitors, the implications of these findings for glia-to-neuron reprogramming strategies, and their potential therapeutic applications. We highlight potential future directions of research, including integrating temporal identity specification with proneural factor overexpression to enhance reprogramming efficiency and broaden the repertoire of neuronal subtypes generated from reprogrammed mammalian glia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.