ArticleEBioMedicine2025
Evolution of SARS-CoV-2 antibody repertoire after successive mRNA vaccinations under immunosuppressive treatment.
Article in EBioMedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Heavy-chain immune repertoire sequencing enables language-model prediction of antigen-specific antibodies.Research square · 2026Article
- COVID-19 mRNA vaccines: a prospective outlook from technological innovation to clinical practice.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
27 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRepeated antigen exposure can result in a shifting antibody repertoire. The mechanisms by which this occurs and consequences for cross-variant protection against evolving pathogens remain incompletely understood, particularly in the context of immunosuppressive treatments used in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMID).
methodsTo investigate this, we characterised longitudinal changes in the anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody repertoire over the course of three SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccinations in patients with IMIDs treated with methotrexate (MTX) and/or tumour necrosis factor-inhibitors (TNFi), anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies, no systemic therapy, and healthy controls (total N = 878). We determined serum antibody titres against the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of Wuhan-Hu-1 (WH1) and Omicron BA.1 spike proteins, and assessed ratios thereof between groups as a proxy for cross-reactivity.
findingsWe observe emerging anti-BA.1 RBD reactivity over time, notably following a third vaccination. This may be partly explained by affinity maturation, as evaluated by inhibition of ACE2-RBD interactions. Similar trends were seen in patients treated with MTX and/or TNFi, but not in patients on anti-CD20 therapy. SARS-CoV-2 infection prior to vaccination accelerated these effects initially while leading to comparable results after three vaccinations.
interpretationMTX and TNFi do not qualitatively alter the evolution of the antibody repertoire in response to repeated antigen exposure, whereas anti-CD20 does. These insights may help to optimise vaccination strategies for patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases.
fundingThis study was supported by ZonMw (The Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development) and SGF (Collaborating Health Funds).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.