Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40009778›Full record

ArticleJMIR medical informatics2025

Predicting Agitation-Sedation Levels in Intensive Care Unit Patients: Development of an Ensemble Model.

Pei-Yu Dai, Pei-Yi Lin, Ruey-Kai Sheu, Shu-Fang Liu, Yu-Cheng Wu, Chieh-Liang Wu, Wei-Lin Chen, Chien-Chung Huang, Guan-Yin Lin, Lun-Chi Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Pei-Yu DaiDepartment of Digital Medicine, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.ORCID 0009-0003-3528-5691
Pei-Yi LinDepartment of Nursing, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, 1650 Taiwan Boulevard Sect. 4, Taichung, 40705, Taiwan.ORCID 0009-0002-0117-4240
Ruey-Kai SheuDepartment of Computer Science, Tunghai University, Taichung, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-3014-8095
Shu-Fang LiuDepartment of Nursing, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, 1650 Taiwan Boulevard Sect. 4, Taichung, 40705, Taiwan.ORCID 0009-0006-1637-6899
Yu-Cheng WuDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, No 1650, Section 4, Taiwan Boulevard, Xitan District, Taichung City, 407219, Taiwan, 886-04-23592525 #2002.ORCID 0009-0005-4311-9954
Chieh-Liang WuDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, No 1650, Section 4, Taiwan Boulevard, Xitan District, Taichung City, 407219, Taiwan, 886-04-23592525 #2002.ORCID 0000-0001-5322-7426
Wei-Lin ChenDepartment of Nursing, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, 1650 Taiwan Boulevard Sect. 4, Taichung, 40705, Taiwan.ORCID 0009-0004-6307-2172
Chien-Chung HuangComputer & Communications Center, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.ORCID 0009-0007-8147-8653
Guan-Yin LinDepartment of Nursing, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, 1650 Taiwan Boulevard Sect. 4, Taichung, 40705, Taiwan.ORCID 0009-0003-1414-5462
Lun-Chi ChenCollege of Engineering, Tunghai University, Taichung, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-8449-7872

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Agitation and sedation management is critical in intensive care as it affects patient safety. Traditional nursing assessments suffer from low frequency and subjectivity. Automating these assessments can boost intensive care unit (ICU) efficiency, treatment capacity, and patient safety. objectives: The aim of this study was to develop a machine-learning based assessment of agitation and sedation. Methods: Using data from the Taichung Veterans General Hospital ICU database (2020), an ensemble learning model was developed for classifying the levels of agitation and sedation. Different ensemble learning model sequences were compared. In addition, an interpretable artificial intelligence approach, SHAP (Shapley additive explanations), was employed for explanatory analysis. Results: With 20 features and 121,303 data points, the random forest model achieved high area under the curve values across all models (sedation classification: 0.97; agitation classification: 0.88). The ensemble learning model enhanced agitation sensitivity (0.82) while maintaining high AUC values across all categories (all >0.82). The model explanations aligned with clinical experience. Conclusions: This study proposes an ICU agitation-sedation assessment automation using machine learning, enhancing efficiency and safety. Ensemble learning improves agitation sensitivity while maintaining accuracy. Real-time monitoring and future digital integration have the potential for advancements in intensive care.

Indexed as

Hypnotics and SedativesIntensive Care UnitsMachine LearningPsychomotor AgitationAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedHypnotics and SedativesagitationAIartificial intelligenceautomationefficiencyensemble learningensemble modelexplanatory analysisICUICU careintensive care unitslearning modelmachine learningMLpatient safetysedation

Identifiers

PMID40009778
PMCPMC11882103

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.