Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40009725›Full record

ArticleNursing open2025

Interventions to Increase Thriving Amongst Older People in Care Homes and Factors Contributing to Their Thriving Experience-A Scoping Review.

Ann-Sofie Silvennoinen, Harriet Finne-Soveri, Lisbeth Fagerström

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ann-Sofie SilvennoinenFaculty of Education and Welfare Studies, Åbo Akademi University, Vasa, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6056-5252
Harriet Finne-SoveriFinnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.
Lisbeth FagerströmFaculty of Education and Welfare Studies, Åbo Akademi University, Vasa, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9932-3592

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThe aim was to map and describe the state of knowledge regarding interventions to promote thriving amongst older people in care homes and the factors that affect their experience of thriving.

designA scoping review. REVIEW

methodsA scoping review based on the methodological framework by Arksey and O'Malley and presented following the PAGER (Patterns, Advances, Gaps, Evidence for Practice, and Research recommendations) framework. DATA SOURCES: Five electronic databases were searched for studies published between 2012 and 2022. From a total of 185 studies found, 17 met the inclusion criteria.

resultsThis study recognised five factors that contribute to thriving: the resident's attitude towards living in a care home, the quality of care and caregivers, activities and interactions with others, qualities of the physical environment and health. Two studies reporting interventions were identified.

conclusionThis scoping review highlights the scarcity of knowledge regarding older people's experience of thriving in care homes. The review results could contribute to our understanding of the factors involved and interventions needed to improve thriving. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE: The focus should be on education and the development of working methods that could improve thriving in care homes. REPORTING

methodThe Prisma ScR-checklist was used. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: No patient or public contribution.

Indexed as

Homes for the AgedNursing HomesAgedHumansQuality of Health Carecare homeinterventionolder peoplescoping reviewthriving

Identifiers

PMID40009725
PMCPMC11864349

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.