Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40009689›Full record

ArticleScience advances2025

Cavity QED in a high NA resonator.

Danial Shadmany, Aishwarya Kumar, Anna Soper, Lukas Palm, Chuan Yin, Henry Ando, Bowen Li, Lavanya Taneja, Matt Jaffe, Schuster David and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Science advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Danial ShadmanyDepartment of Physics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID 0009-0000-6256-6294
Aishwarya KumarDepartment of Physics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Anna SoperDepartment of Applied Physics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5747-9062
Lukas PalmDepartment of Physics, The University of Chicago and the James Franck Institute, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1383-4293
Chuan YinDepartment of Physics, The University of Chicago and the James Franck Institute, Chicago, IL, USA.
Henry AndoDepartment of Physics, The University of Chicago and the James Franck Institute, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5147-0817
Bowen LiDepartment of Physics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID 0009-0003-3593-9675
Lavanya TanejaDepartment of Physics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2223-0344
Matt JaffeDepartment of Physics, The University of Chicago and the James Franck Institute, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2554-2562
Schuster DavidDepartment of Applied Physics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0012-3874
Jon SimonDepartment of Physics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

From fundamental studies of light-matter interaction to applications in quantum networking and sensing, cavity quantum electrodynamics (QED) provides a toolbox to control interactions between atoms and photons. The coherence of interactions is determined by the single-pass atomic absorption and number of photon round-trips. Reducing the cavity loss has enabled resonators supporting 1 million roundtrips but with limited material choices and increased alignment sensitivity. Here, we present a high-numerical aperture, lens-based resonator that pushes the single-atom single-photon absorption probability near its fundamental limit, reducing the mode size at the atom to order λ. This resonator provides a single-atom cooperativity of 1.6 in a cavity where the light circulates ∼10 times. We load single

Identifiers

PMID40009689
PMCPMC11864187

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.