Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40009621›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2025

"You always have a high sugar if you don't communicate": A qualitative secondary analysis of 'Diabetes Together' process evaluation data from couples in South Africa.

Lucy Lynch, Myrna van Pinxteren, Peter Delobelle, Naomi Levitt, Buyelwa Majikela-Dlangamandla, Kate Greenwell, Nuala McGrath

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lucy LynchSchool of Primary Care, Population Sciences, and Medical Education (PPM), Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8957-5040
Myrna van PinxterenChronic Diseases Initiative for Africa (CDIA), Department of Medicine, University of Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6046-9607
Peter DelobelleChronic Diseases Initiative for Africa (CDIA), Department of Medicine, University of Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9016-7458
Naomi LevittChronic Diseases Initiative for Africa (CDIA), Department of Medicine, University of Cape Town, South Africa.
Buyelwa Majikela-DlangamandlaChronic Diseases Initiative for Africa (CDIA), Department of Medicine, University of Cape Town, South Africa.
Kate GreenwellSchool of Primary Care, Population Sciences, and Medical Education (PPM), Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3662-1488
Nuala McGrathSchool of Primary Care, Population Sciences, and Medical Education (PPM), Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1039-0159

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2D) can negatively impact relationships which may affect health and disease management. This can be moderated by positive communication between partners. Our aims were first, to identify ways in which couples' communication and T2D impact each other. Second, we aimed to explore how improving couples' communication may enhance self-management for people living with T2D (PLWD) and their partners in South Africa. We conducted secondary data analysis of qualitative interview and focus group data from an intervention pilot study designed to improve T2D self-management - 'Diabetes Together'. 14 PLWD and their partners took part in two diabetes self-management workshops, including communication skills training, and were offered two couples counselling sessions. Inductive thematic and dyadic analysis explored how T2D and couples' communication were connected, and how participants perceived the impact of couples' communication skills training. Findings were compared to data collected from qualitative interviews with intervention-naive participants. We generated four themes linking couples' communication and T2D: tone of discussions; listening; openness; and being informed about T2D. Participants described that T2D can create negative moods and stress (both from the disease and its management) and this can make communication challenging. They reported that negative communication styles can create stress worsening T2D and making it harder to manage. Participants felt that positive communication could ease stress, enable problem-solving and support behaviour change, which may improve T2D management. Couples reported that communication skills training helped them to address communication-related issues in their relationships. This included managing negative moods, changing communication styles and developing skills to discuss, listen and collaborate on improving T2D self-management. PLWD and their partners perceived that T2D and couples' communication can affect one another positively and negatively. Equipping couples with effective communication skills may empower them to manage T2D more effectively.

Identifiers

PMID40009621
PMCPMC11864531

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.