Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40009620›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Process of use of evidence products by frontline maternal, newborn and child health staff at the facility level in Ghana.

Gordon Abekah-Nkrumah, Doris Ottie-Boakye, Richmond Owusu, Johnson Ermel, Sombié Issiaka, Anita Asiwome Adzo Baku

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Gordon Abekah-NkrumahDepartment of Public Administration and Health Services Management, University of Ghana Business School, Accra, Ghana.
Doris Ottie-BoakyeRegional Institute for Population Studies, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana.
Richmond OwusuSchool of Public Health, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana.ORCID 0000-0002-0066-3491
Johnson ErmelProfessional Assistant in Research, West African Health Organisation, Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso.
Sombié IssiakaProfessional Assistant in Research, West African Health Organisation, Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso.
Anita Asiwome Adzo BakuDepartment of Public Administration and Health Services Management, University of Ghana Business School, Accra, Ghana.ORCID 0000-0002-4741-592X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although the use of evidence products has been identified as beneficial in improving reproductive, maternal and child health, very little is known about the processes that facilitate the use of these evidence products by frontline Maternal, Newborn and Child Health and Reproductive and Child Health (RNCH/RCH) practitioners in decision-making on the issues that confront them in their line of work. The study examined the nature, processes, and barriers, to the use of evidence products for care decision-making by frontline MNCH/RCH staff in selected health facilities in Ghana. Using a qualitative case study design, interviews of 24 frontline RNCH/RCH practitioners across 16 healthcare facilities in the Greater Accra, Eastern, and Ashanti regions of Ghana were conducted. The study employed a semi-structured interview guide modelled along the Action Cycle phase of the Knowledge-To-Action (KTA) framework, and the objectives of the study. Themes were built out of the transcribed data. The study revealed that the processes that facilitate the use of evidence products include problem identification activities (such as service evaluation, using accepted benchmarks, inadequate logistics for providing service and client feedback) and, adapting knowledge to their local context. The usual suspects of socio-cultural and health systems-related factors such as resource constraints and human factors were found to hinder the use of evidence products in providing RNCH/RCH services. The study contributes to knowledge by operationalising the KTA, simplifying the concept of knowledge sustainability and makes it easy for adoption and implementation especially at the frontline. Appropriate interventions that rely on strong education to navigate the societal norms and beliefs that inhibit the uptake of evidence-based care by clients will be essential in improving the use of evidence to inform practice decisions.

Indexed as

Child HealthHealth PersonnelMaternal-Child Health ServicesMaternal Health ServicesAdultChildDecision MakingFemaleGhanaHealth FacilitiesHumansInfant, NewbornMale

Identifiers

PMID40009620
PMCPMC11864507

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.