Trial reportPloS one2025
Comparison of two methods of measuring physical activity and its related components among middle age women: Pedometer versus self-report.
Trial report in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Physical Activity Assessment-Self-Reported Versus Pedometer-Measured, and Associations with Health Markers Among University Students in South Africa.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPhysical activity is essential for health maintenance across various dimensions; however, sedentary behavior remains widespread in numerous societies. Notably, women often exhibit higher levels of sedentary behavior than men, potentially exacerbating complications related to motherhood. This study aims to assess and compare physical activity levels in middle-aged women (30-45) using self-reported measures and pedometers while exploring associated factors in the context of reproductive health.
methodsThis study analyzed secondary data from a randomized controlled trial involving 91 women aged 30-45 from Semnan University of Medical Sciences. Participants completed a validated 12-item questionnaire and wore Omron Style Pro-2 pedometers for one week to assess physical activity levels. Women were categorized as active or inactive based on self-reports and pedometer data. Statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS version 27. Participants provided informed consent, ensuring confidentiality throughout the study.
resultsThe study involved 91 women with a mean age of 27.4 years, of whom 82.6% were married. Only 11.7% self-reported as "low active," while pedometer data revealed that 94.5% were inactive or had insufficient physical activity. A significant relationship was found between the number of children and physical activity levels, with women who had children being more active (p = 0.035). No correlation was observed between self-reported activity and pedometer measurements, indicating women often overestimate their physical activity levels. DISCUSSION: This study highlights the inaccuracies in self-reported physical activity assessments. Most women were found to be physically inactive, with the number of children influencing their activity levels. These findings underscore the need for interventions to increase women's physical activity.
conclusionThese findings bear important implications for health policy within communities. Further research involving larger sample sizes across various age and gender demographics is warranted to enhance our understanding of physical activity patterns and inform targeted interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.