ArticleMolecular oncology2025
Stochastic variation in the FOXM1 transcription program mediates replication stress tolerance.
Article in Molecular oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Oncogene-induced replication stress (RS) is a vulnerability of cancer cells that forces reliance on the intra-S-phase checkpoint to ensure faithful genome duplication. Inhibitors of the intra-S-phase checkpoint kinases ATR and CHK1 have been developed, but resistance to these drugs remains problematic. Understanding drug tolerance mechanisms is impeded by analysis of bulk samples, which neglect tumor heterogeneity and often fail to accurately interpret cell cycle-mediated resistance. Here, by combining intracellular immunostaining and single-cell RNA-sequencing, we characterized the transcriptomes of oncogenic RAS-expressing cells with variable levels of RS when challenged with a CHK1 inhibitor combined with gemcitabine. We identified 37 genes differentially expressed between tolerant and sensitive cells, including several FOXM1 targets. While complete knockdown of FOXM1 impeded cell proliferation, partial knockdown protected cells against DNA damage, and improved recovery from drug-induced RS. Remarkably, knockdown of individual FOXM1 target genes UBE2C and MKI67 also mitigated DNA damage, uncovering unanticipated roles for these in the replication stress response. Our results suggest that low levels of FOXM1-dependent gene expression during S and G2 phase protects cells against excessive DNA damage during drug-induced replication stress.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.