ArticleThe Journal of physiology2025
High-definition transcranial direct-current stimulation of left primary motor cortices modulates beta and gamma oscillations serving motor control.
Article in The Journal of physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- High-definition tDCS of the motor cortex affects prefrontal and primary motor activity differently in young and older adults.GeroScience · 2026Article
- Testosterone modulates multispectral oscillatory activity serving performance of motor sequences in typically developing youth.The Journal of physiology · 2026Article
- Non-invasive neuroregulation techniques applied to patients with consciousness disorders: a narrative review.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2026Review
- Dual-montage high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS) modulates the neural dynamics serving working memory.NeuroImage · 2025Article
- High-definition transcranial direct current stimulation of the right inferior parietal modulates oscillatory activity in higher-order regions serving attention reorientation.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
- Transcranial direct current stimulation for enhancing attention following mild traumatic brain injury: a narrative review.Frontiers in neurologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recent studies have linked non-invasive transcranial direct-current stimulation (tDCS) with altered neural processing near the site of stimulation and across a distributed network of brain regions, with some evidence for a possible therapeutic role. However, negative results also exist and the potential impacts on motor-related neural oscillations have rarely been studied. Herein, we applied high-definition tDCS to the left primary motor cortex of 62 healthy adults in three sessions (anodal, cathodal and sham). Participants then performed a motor task with two conditions (i.e. cognitive interference and no interference) during magnetoencephalography (MEG). The MEG data were imaged in the time-frequency domain and whole-brain, voxel-wise maps were probed for task condition and stimulation effects. Our results indicated the classic pattern of slower behavioural responses and stronger neural oscillations in frontal and parietal cortices during interference relative to no-interference trials. Importantly, we found task condition-by-stimulation interactions involving motor-related gamma oscillations, with weaker interference effects after cathodal stimulation relative to anodal and sham in the right prefrontal, left temporoparietal junction and left cerebellar cortices. Conversely, stronger gamma interference responses were found in the right motor and superior parietal cortices following anodal relative to cathodal and sham. Lastly, main effects of stimulation indicated stronger beta oscillations following anodal stimulation in the left supplementary motor area. Taken together, these data provide key mechanistic insight into the polarity-specific effects of tDCS on the neural oscillatory dynamics serving motor control. Such findings reflect the modulatory effects of tDCS on population-level neural oscillatory responses distant from the stimulation site. KEY POINTS: Neurophysiological studies have indicated that beta and gamma oscillations are critical to motor control and that their dynamics are modulated by higher-order features of the task. Recent investigations have shown that transcranial direct-current stimulation (tDCS) affects neural activity both locally and in brain regions distant from the stimulation site, but the mechanisms remain poorly understood. Sixty-two adults underwent anodal, cathodal and sham high-definition tDCS of the left motor cortices and completed a motor task with two levels of cognitive interference during magnetoencephalography (MEG). Task condition by stimulation-type interactions on movement-related gamma oscillations were observed across a distributed network of higher-order brain regions, including parietal cortices, right prefrontal and left temporoparietal junction. In sum, our results indicate polarity-specific effects on beta and gamma oscillations across a distributed network of brain regions that contribute to motor control in the context of interference and hold implications for understanding the therapeutic capacity of tDCS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.