Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40009402›Full record

ArticleJAMA dermatology2025

Validation of DermSat-7 for Assessing Treatment Satisfaction in Patients With Psoriasis.

April W Armstrong, Kathryn Lee, Danielle Yee, Michael Woodbury, Melissa Zundell, Caterina Zagona-Prizio, Jenna Yousif, Carly Grant, Ali Shields, Peichi Chou and 4 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA dermatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07352306 (The Efficacy of Topical Diacerein Cream in Patients With Psoriasis Vulgaris), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07352306 phase4not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

The Efficacy of Topical Diacerein Cream in Patients With Psoriasis Vulgaris

TypeinterventionalSponsorCairo UniversityRan2026 to 2027Enrolled60ConditionsPsoriasis VulgarisArmsDiacerein, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Building the foundations for an international patient-centred outcomes set for psoriasis: A scoping study.Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

April W ArmstrongDivision of Dermatology, University of California, Los Angeles.
Kathryn LeeSt Louis University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri.
Danielle YeeDivision of Dermatology, University of California, Los Angeles.
Michael WoodburyDepartment of Dermatology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Melissa ZundellDepartment of Dermatology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
Caterina Zagona-PrizioDepartment of Dermatology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora.
Jenna YousifDepartment of Dermatology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
Carly GrantDepartment of Dermatology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Ali ShieldsDepartment of Dermatology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Peichi ChouUniversity of California, Riverside School of Medicine, Riverside.
Kristina Callis DuffinDepartment of Dermatology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City.
Alice B GottliebDepartment of Dermatology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
Joseph F MerolaDepartment of Dermatology and Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas.
Lourdes Perez-ChadaDepartment of Dermatology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: A critical need exists for developing a validated dermatologic-specific treatment satisfaction instrument. Objective: To evaluate the structural validity, internal consistency, construct validity, and test-retest reliability of the 7-item dermatology-specific treatment satisfaction (DermSat-7) instrument in patients with psoriasis. Design, Setting, and Participants: This survey study was conducted from July 2020 to April 2023 in dermatology outpatient clinics at the University of Southern California, Brigham and Women's Hospital, and Mount Sinai Union Square and included adults (aged ≥18 years) with psoriasis who were fluent in English. On day 1, the clinician at the study sites assessed psoriasis disease severity in person using the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI), body surface area (BSA), and Physician Global Assessment (PGA). On day 1, study participants completed the DermSat-7, the generic 9-item Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM-9), and the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI). They also answered demographic questions and reported their own disease severity using the Patient Global Assessment (PtGA). On day 14 (±2 days), the patient then completed the DermSat-7 and PtGA a second time. Main Outcomes and Measures: The DermSat-7 is a 7-item self-administered instrument with a recall period of 14 days that assesses patient satisfaction with their treatments across various inflammatory dermatology diseases, including psoriasis. Construct validity, structural validity, internal consistency, and test-retest reliability of DermSat-7 were assessed as defined by the Consensus-Based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) taxonomy and reported following the COSMIN reporting guideline for studies on measurement properties. Results: The analysis included 142 patients with psoriasis (mean [SD] age, 51.1 [15.5] years; 77 males [54.2%]). Exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis supported the unidimensionality of the DermSat-7 domains. The internal consistency of the effectiveness and convenience domains was high with a Cronbach α of 0.88 and 0.81, respectively. Regarding construct validity, differences between groups based on PASI/PGA scores were aligned with preexisting hypotheses, and the correlations between DermSat-7 and TSQM-9 subscores were strong to very strong (ρ = 0.75 for effectiveness; ρ = 0.66 for convenience; and ρ = 0.70 for overall satisfaction; all P < .001). Intraclass correlation was 0.85, indicating high test-retest reliability. Conclusions and Relevance: This survey study found that the DermSat-7 may be a valid and reliable instrument for measuring treatment satisfaction in patients with psoriasis.

Identifiers

PMID40009402
PMCPMC11866064

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.