ArticleJournal of vision2025
The CRIP effect: How a pattern in central vision interferes with perception of a pattern in the periphery.
Article in Journal of vision, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- How Does Peripheral Vision Feel Rich? A Selective Review.Journal of eye movement research · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Our percept of the world is the result of interactions between central and peripheral vision. They can be facilitatory, because central vision is informative about what is in the periphery, or detrimental, such as when shape elements are pooled. We introduce a novel phenomenon, in which elements in the central region impair perception in the periphery (central region interference with periphery [CRIP]). We showed participants a squared grid containing small lines (vertical or diagonal) or crosses in the central region and diagonal lines in the periphery. The regions were divided by a gap that varied in size and position. Participants reported the orientation of the diagonal lines in the periphery (/ or \). The central pattern caused interference and hindered discrimination. For a fixed eccentricity of the peripheral elements, the smaller the gap the larger the impairment. The effect was only present when the central and peripheral lines had a shared orientation (i.e., diagonal), suggesting that similarity plays a role. Surprisingly, performance was worse if central and peripheral lines had the same orientation. We conclude that people do not rely on extrapolation when perceiving elements in the periphery and that iso-orientation may cause greater interference.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.