ArticleJAMA network open2025
Trends in Guideline-Concordant Care for Inflammatory Breast Cancer.
Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Clinically Aligned 18-Item Instrument for Measuring Inflammatory Breast Cancer Knowledge.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- A Novel Patient-Derived Xenograft Model of Inflammatory Breast Cancer.Research square · 2026Article
- Autologous Versus Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: Insights From Recent Oncologic and Plastic Surgery Guidelines.Cureus · 2026Review
- Survival and Treatment Patterns in Stage III Inflammatory and Noninflammatory Breast Cancer.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Assessing the accuracy of inflammatory breast cancer self-reported diagnoses through the metastatic breast cancer project from the count me in initiative database.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2025Article
- Racial and ethnic disparities in survival outcomes among patients with inflammatory breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.NPJ breast cancer · 2025Article
- Investigating the Prognostic Impact of Postpartum Diagnosis in Women with De Novo Stage IV Inflammatory Breast Cancer.Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- Clinicopathological and molecular characterization of inflammatory breast cancer, the prospective INFLAME registry study.NPJ breast cancer · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is an aggressive variant for which trimodality treatment (ie, neoadjuvant systemic therapy [NST] followed by modified radical mastectomy without immediate reconstruction and postmastectomy radiotherapy [PMRT]) represents guideline-concordant care (GCC) and is associated with improved overall survival (OS). However, it is unclear whether there are disparities in trimodality treatment receipt among patients with IBC and how such disparities might affect OS. Objective: To assess trends in IBC trimodality treatment receipt in a contemporary cohort. Design, Setting, and Participants: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from the National Cancer Database. Women with nonmetastatic IBC treated from calendar years 2010 to 2018 were included. Data analysis was performed from April 1, 2023, to March 1, 2024. Exposures: Guideline-concordant care (ie, trimodality treatment administered in the correct sequence with time to NST initiation <60 days post diagnosis). Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcomes were associations between patient-, disease-, treatment-, and facility-level factors and receipt of overall and modality-specific GCC and associations between these factors and adjusted OS. Results: Of 6945 patients identified (median age, 57 [IQR, 47-66] years; 2.4% Asian or Pacific Islander, 7.8% Hispanic, 17.1% non-Hispanic Black, and 71.5% non-Hispanic White), only 1740 (25.1%) received all forms of GCC: 91.3% (n = 5662) received NST initiation less than 60 days post diagnosis, 63.3% (n = 4395) received PMRT, and 51.3% (n = 3564) underwent guideline-concordant surgery (ie, modified radical mastectomy without immediate reconstruction with >6 lymph nodes removed). Receipt of GCC did not differ significantly by race and ethnicity, insurance status, or location. Asian (odds ratio [OR], 0.48; 95% CI, 0.27-0.84), Black (OR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.41-0.68), and Hispanic (OR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.29-0.55) patients were less likely to have NST initiation less than 60 days post diagnosis vs White patients (all P ≤ .001). Recipients of GCC had improved adjusted OS vs nonrecipients (hazard ratio [HR], 0.75; 95% CI, 0.68-0.84; P < .001). Black patients had significantly lower adjusted OS ,compared with White recipients (HR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.26-1.58; P < .001). When GCC was received for triple-negative IBC, there was no racial and ethnic disparity in OS. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of women with nonmetastatic IBC, there were no disparities observed in GCC receipt, but only 25.1% of patients with IBC received all forms of GCC for which they were eligible. Among those who received GCC, there was no racial disparity in survival for triple-negative IBC, suggesting opportunities to improve equity through standardization of care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.