ArticleJAMA network open2025
Racial Differences in ctDNA Profiles, Targeted Therapy Use, and Outcomes in Metastatic Breast Cancer.
Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Circulating Tumor DNA as a Biomarker for Precision Medicine in Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Pooled it
- Associations of neighborhood deprivation with breast cancer tumor genomics, targeted treatment use, and survival.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2026Observational
- Racial differences in biomarkers, treatment, and outcomes in HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer in the United States.NPJ breast cancer · 2026Article
- Integrated miRNA-mRNA Analyses of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer in Black and White Patients with or Without Obesity.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Breast cancer as the first primary malignancy: clinical pathological characteristics of common cancer combinations.Discover oncology · 2025Review
- Bridging the gap: ctDNA, genomics, and equity in breast cancer care.NPJ breast cancer · 2025Review
- The impact of liquid biopsy in breast cancer: Redefining the landscape of non-invasive precision oncology.The journal of liquid biopsy · 2025Review
- Error in Affiliations.JAMA network open · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Black patients with metastatic breast cancer (mBC) have higher mortality rates than White patients despite advances in treatment. Objectives: To examine whether Black patients with metastatic breast cancer have different genomic profiles compared with White patients and whether there are inequities in targeted treatment use between these groups. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective, population-based cohort study assessed adult patients with mBC who underwent genomic profiling at academic institutions in the US between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2023. Data analysis was performed between July 2023 and July 2024. A validation cohort was also included. Exposures: Targeted treatment use. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcomes were differences in circulating tumor DNA profiles and use of phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K), mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), and cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors between Black and White patients with metastatic breast cancer. Results: The study sample included 1327 women with mBC (mean [SD] age, 58.0 [12.8] years; 140 Black and 1057 White). Black patients had a significantly higher rate of GATA3 single-nucleotide variants (odds ratio, 2.31; 95% CI, 1.17-4.54; P = .02) and CCND2 copy number variants (odds ratio, 4.63; 95% CI, 1.79-11.97; P = .002) on multivariate analysis. These differences were validated in a population-based evidence cohort of 27 224 patients. Black patients with PIK3CA single-nucleotide variants were significantly less likely to receive PI3K inhibitors than White patients (1 of 17 [5.9%] vs 45 of 156 [28.8%]; P = .04), whereas there was no difference in use of CDK4/6 and mTOR inhibitors, which do not require a targetable alteration. Black patients had a shorter overall survival from the time of circulating tumor DNA testing compared with White patients. Conclusions and Relevance: This cohort study of patients with mBC found somatic differences, shorter overall survival, and targeted treatment disparities in PI3K inhibitor use in Black compared with White patients despite equal incidence of PIK3CA alterations. Researchers should consider these differences when designing future research and interventions to address the striking and persistent outcomes gap between Black and White patients with mBC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.