ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2025
Retinal Responses to Short- and Longer-Term Predominant ON or OFF Stimulation in Emmetropes and Myopes.
Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sustained Plus Lens Defocus Alters Retinal Responses and Ciliary Muscle Morphology In Myopes and Near-emmetropes.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026Article
- Short-Term Changes in Retinal Activity With Four Myopia Control Spectacle Lenses.Translational vision science & technology · 2026Article
- IMI: The Role of Light in Refractive Development and Myopia: Evidence from Animal and Human Studies.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2025Review
- Methylphenidate Inhibits the Development of Myopia by Altering Dopamine and Norepinephrine Reuptake.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The link between nearwork and myopia is controversially discussed. Features of the viewing target may stimulate eye growth, for example, black-on-white text was found to stimulate retinal OFF pathways and promote choroidal thinning, whereas inverted text led to ON pathway stimulation and thicker choroids. We used electroretinograms (ERGs) to compare retinal activity for both stimuli in the parafovea in emmetropes and myopes and studied the effects of adaptation. Methods: ERGs were recorded in 42 subjects (18-30 years) during 200 ms-flashes on a CRT monitor, superimposed with an annulus or circles filled with gray or inverted or standard text. Ganzfeld ERGs (500 ms) were taken before and after 30 minutes of reading standard or inverted text at 25 cm to determine adaptation effects. The ON- (b-wave) and OFF-responses (d-wave) were analyzed using linear mixed effects models and pointwise t-testing. Results: (1) Stimulus size affected retinal ON-responses of both groups (p < 0.001), with larger responses to a 6 to 12 degrees annulus than to a 12-degree circle. (2) Myopes displayed larger ON-responses to inverted text contrast than emmetropes within 6 to 12 degrees. (3) After adaptation to text, ON-responses were reduced (p = 0.010) irrespective of refraction and contrast. (4) Emmetropes showed reduced ON- and OFF-responses to inverted text contrast. (5) Only emmetropes had reduced ON- and larger OFF-responses after adapting to standard text. Conclusions: Myopes had largest ON-responses with inverted contrast in the perifovea. Emmetropes displayed larger adaptive changes after ON/OFF stimulation. In both groups, inverted contrast still reduced ON-responses, suggesting that efficient activation of retinal ON channels to inhibit myopia might require additional OFF channel suppression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.