Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40009273›Full record

ArticleBiomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology2025

Homogenized multiscale modelling of an electrically active double poroelastic material representing the myocardium.

Laura Miller, Raimondo Penta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Laura MillerSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Glasgow, University Place, Glasgow, G12 8QQ, UK.
Raimondo PentaSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Glasgow, University Place, Glasgow, G12 8QQ, UK. Raimondo.Penta@glasgow.ac.uk.

Funding

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EP/S030875/1Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EP/T517896/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this work, we present the derivation of a novel model for the myocardium that incorporates the underlying poroelastic nature of the material constituents as well as the electrical conductivity. The myocardium has a microstructure consisting of a poroelastic extracellular matrix with embedded poroelastic myocytes, i.e. a double poroelastic material. Due to the sharp length scale separation that exists between the microscale, where the individual myocytes are clearly resolved from the surrounding matrix, and the length of the entire heart muscle, we can apply the asymptotic homogenization technique. The novel PDE model accounts for the difference in the electric potentials, elastic properties as well as the differences in the hydraulic conductivities at different points in the microstructure. The differences in these properties are encoded in the coefficients and are to be computed by solving differential cell problems arising when applying the asymptotic homogenization technique. We present a numerical analysis of the obtained Biot's modulus, Young's moduli as well as shears and the effective electrical activity. By investigating the poroelastic and electrical nature of the myocardium in one model, we can understand how the differences in elastic displacements between the extracellular matrix and the myocytes affect mechanotransduction and the influence of disease.

Indexed as

ElasticityModels, BiologicalModels, CardiovascularMyocardiumAnimalsComputer SimulationElastic ModulusElectric ConductivityExtracellular MatrixHumansMyocytes, CardiacPorosityAsymptotic homogenizationComposite materialsMyocardial modellingPoroelasticity

Identifiers

PMID40009273
PMCPMC12055945

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.