Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40009268›Full record

ReviewOphthalmology and therapy2025

Clinical and Socioeconomic Burden of Retinal Diseases: Can Biosimilars Add Value? A Narrative Review.

Seenu M Hariprasad, Frank G Holz, Carl V Asche, Amine Issa, Oriol Mora, Simon Keady, Mourad F Rezk, Phil Sarocco, Steven Simoens

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Ophthalmology and therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Freeze-Dried Extracts ofPreventive nutrition and food science · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Seenu M Hariprasad *Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, The University of Chicago Medicine and Biological Sciences, 5841 S. Maryland Avenue, MC2114: Room S-438, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA. retina@uchicago.edu.
Frank G Holz *Department of Ophthalmology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Carl V AschePharmacotherapy Outcomes Research Center, Department of Pharmacotherapy, College of Pharmacy, L. S. Skaggs Pharmacy Institute, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Amine IssaBiogen GmbH, Baar, Switzerland.
Oriol MoraBiogen GmbH, Baar, Switzerland.
Simon KeadyBiogen GmbH, Baar, Switzerland.
Mourad F RezkBiogen GmbH, Baar, Switzerland.
Phil SaroccoHealth Economics & Outcomes Research, US Medical, Biogen, Weston, MA, USA.
Steven SimoensDepartment of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9512-2005

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Retinal diseases, such as neovascular age-related macular degeneration, diabetic retinopathy, and retinal vein occlusion, pose a significant global burden on individuals, families, and healthcare systems. Intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy has become the standard treatment for retinal diseases, improving clinical outcomes, while delaying disease progression. Although effective, biologics are associated with high costs, which can lead to underutilisation and, consequently, suboptimal patient treatment outcomes, further contributing to healthcare costs. Additionally, the expansion in the elderly population is predicted to significantly increase costs and burden on healthcare systems due to retinal diseases, requiring effective strategies and the utilisation of emerging technologies that are crucial public health priorities for tackling global vision impairment. Recently, anti-VEGF biosimilars have been approved and are expected to provide a cost-effective alternative, while providing equivalent efficacy and comparable safety, immunogenicity, and pharmacokinetic profiles as the reference product. The entry of biosimilars holds the promise of meeting some of these unmet needs, giving physicians and patients access to sustainable treatments that can provide cost-effective therapy, enabling savings to be reinvested into healthcare facilities. This article aims to review the impact of retinal diseases on clinical, social, and financial aspects of patient care, emphasising the potential value of biosimilars in ophthalmology.

Indexed as

Anti-VEGFBiosimilarsBurdenChoroidal vascular diseaseCost-effectivenessEconomicRetinal diseasesRetinal vascular diseaseSocioeconomic

Identifiers

PMID40009268
PMCPMC11920568

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.