ArticleAIDS (London, England)2025
From pregnancy to beyond: renewed emphasis on comprehensive HIV prevention in South Africa.
Article in AIDS (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trends in HIV Incidence, Prevalence, Antiretroviral Therapy Coverage and Mother-to-Child Transmission Among Pregnant and Breastfeeding Women in the Eastern Cape Province, South Africa, 2000-2023.Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2026Article
- Optimizing Identification and Care of Pregnant/Breastfeeding Women Living With HIV in Resource-Limited Settings.Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2026Article
- Antenatal Screening for Sexually Transmitted Infections to Reduce Preterm Birth or Low Birthweight (Philani Ndiphile Study): A Randomized Three-Group Trial.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Male partner involvement in pregnant and breastfeeding women's use of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) in a low-income setting in South Africa.Research square · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
South Africa continues to document high HIV prevalence, particularly among pregnant women, highlighting significant prevention gaps. This viewpoint triangulates findings from the Sixth South African HIV Prevalence Survey, the 2022 Antenatal HIV Sentinel Survey, and our ongoing "Philani Ndiphile" trial, which is evaluating STI screening algorithms to improve pregnancy outcomes. Despite a recent national decline in antenatal HIV prevalence, the Philani trial recorded an HIV prevalence of 28.6% among pregnant women, mirroring high rates across the Eastern Cape Province. The trial cohort also revealed a significant increasing trend in HIV prevalence with age, from 6% at 18 years to 63% at 43 years, highlighting the need for age-targeted interventions in young women of childbearing age. National progress toward UNAIDS' targets for HIV status knowledge and ART initiation is evident; however, viral suppression remains a challenge, reflected in the 20% of Philani participants newly initiated or reinitiated on ART at their first antenatal visit. Efforts to reduce new HIV infections require strengthening, as high incidence rates persist among young women and during pregnancy and postpartum. Expanding access to oral and long-acting PrEP for pregnant and postpartum women is critical. Current coverage is low, and while new options show promise, implementation guidance remains limited. Socioeconomic factors, such as poverty and intimate partner violence, exacerbate HIV risk. Comprehensive interventions, including educational and vocational support, engaging male partners, and addressing STIs are essential. Continued support from global health partnerships and innovation in prevention strategies are vital to ending the epidemic and ensuring equitable outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.