ReviewRadiologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2025
[Misdiagnoses in the diagnostics of the abdomen and pelvis].
Review in Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Misdiagnoses in abdominal radiology are a frequent source of clinical errors, often stemming from cognitive biases and perception errors. Typical sources of error include perceptual and interpretative issues, frequently influenced by cognitive mechanisms, such as anchoring and confirmation biases or the satisfaction of search bias. Technical errors, such as suboptimal windowing in computed tomography, also contribute to diagnostic inaccuracies. Enhancing diagnostic accuracy requires awareness of these biases and a systematic reflection on the diagnostic process. This approach enables early error prevention and improves the diagnostic quality in abdominal imaging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40009180What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.