Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40009167›Full record

ArticleAnnals of hematology2025

Sequential combined bypassing therapy in haemophilia patients with high titer inhibitors: surgical experience.

Bingjie Ding, Xuewen Song, Liu Liu, Xiaoying Niu, Mengjuan Li, Yuanyuan Zhang, Shujun Shao, Ao Xia, Jingyuan Liu, Jing Zhang and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of hematology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Bingjie Ding *Department of Hematology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Hemostasis and Thrombosis Diagnostic Engineering Research Center of Henan Province, 127 Dongming Road, Zhengzhou, 450008, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1567-8100
Xuewen Song *Department of Hematology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Hemostasis and Thrombosis Diagnostic Engineering Research Center of Henan Province, 127 Dongming Road, Zhengzhou, 450008, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8341-7957
Liu LiuDepartment of Hematology, First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450000, China.
Xiaoying NiuDepartment of Orthopaedic and Soft Tissue, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, 127 Dongming Road, Zhengzhou, 450008, China.
Mengjuan LiDepartment of Hematology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Hemostasis and Thrombosis Diagnostic Engineering Research Center of Henan Province, 127 Dongming Road, Zhengzhou, 450008, China.
Yuanyuan ZhangDepartment of Hematology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Hemostasis and Thrombosis Diagnostic Engineering Research Center of Henan Province, 127 Dongming Road, Zhengzhou, 450008, China.
Shujun ShaoBlood Transfusion Department, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, 450008, China.
Ao XiaDepartment of Hematology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Hemostasis and Thrombosis Diagnostic Engineering Research Center of Henan Province, 127 Dongming Road, Zhengzhou, 450008, China.
Jingyuan LiuDepartment of Hematology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Hemostasis and Thrombosis Diagnostic Engineering Research Center of Henan Province, 127 Dongming Road, Zhengzhou, 450008, China.
Jing ZhangDepartment of Hematology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Hemostasis and Thrombosis Diagnostic Engineering Research Center of Henan Province, 127 Dongming Road, Zhengzhou, 450008, China.
Po LiDepartment of Orthopaedic and Soft Tissue, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, 127 Dongming Road, Zhengzhou, 450008, China.
Fan ZhangDepartment of Orthopaedic and Soft Tissue, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, 127 Dongming Road, Zhengzhou, 450008, China.
Guancong LiuDepartment of Orthopaedic and Soft Tissue, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, 127 Dongming Road, Zhengzhou, 450008, China.
Zhehuang LiDepartment of Orthopaedic and Soft Tissue, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, 127 Dongming Road, Zhengzhou, 450008, China.
Peng ZhangDepartment of Orthopaedic and Soft Tissue, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, 127 Dongming Road, Zhengzhou, 450008, China. zdzp@zzu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5259-1429
Hu ZhouDepartment of Hematology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Hemostasis and Thrombosis Diagnostic Engineering Research Center of Henan Province, 127 Dongming Road, Zhengzhou, 450008, China. tigerzhoupumc@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7346-7435

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 81600097National Natural Science Foundation of China 82070120
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sequential combination bypass therapy (SCBT) is an effective treatment option for haemophilia patients with inhibitors; however, its safety, efficacy, and cost have largely have yet to be systematically evaluated. To address this question, we retrospectively analyzed the medical records of 14 haemophilia patients with high titer inhibitors who underwent surgery. The patients with high inhibitors were treated with two SCBT regimens by optimizing doses of the recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) and prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC). The effectiveness and safety of the two SCBT regimens were evaluated. In addition, rFVIIa and PCC factor consumption and costs were also compared. The median age of the 14 patients was 30.00 (27.25-42.75) years. They all underwent major surgeries, with 85.71% (12/14) was orthopedic surgeries related to hemophilic arthropathy. Four patients were treated using regimen 1 and ten with regimen 2. Results showed that regimen 2 exhibited a higher haemostatic efficiency (90% vs. 75% intraoperative and 90% vs. 50% postoperative) and a 28.0% reduction in economic costs (863,604.68 RMB vs. 621,756.62 RMB). All patients after surgery had no prothrombin time extension, 7.14% had fibrinogen and platelet count decreases, and 57.14% had D-dimer increases that returned to baseline within 5-7 days after SCBT. The study shows that regimen 2 as an optimized SCBT regimen is an efficient approach to secure haemostasis for haemophilia patients with high titer inhibitors in the perioperative period, rather than regimen 1. The findings can help design future clinical studies and provide more reliable data and implementation advice.

Indexed as

Blood Coagulation FactorsFactor VIIaHemophilia AAdultFemaleHumansMaleRecombinant ProteinsRetrospective StudiesBlood Coagulation FactorsFactor VIIaprothrombin complex concentratesrecombinant FVIIaRecombinant ProteinsHaemophiliaHigh titer inhibitorsSequential combined bypassing therapySurgery

Identifiers

PMID40009167
PMCPMC12031746

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.