Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40009146›Full record

ArticleNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2025

Neurology and physician-assisted suicide: glossary of definitions and terminology.

Alessandra Solari, Nicola Ticozzi, Giancarlo Comi, Gianluigi Mancardi, Leandro Provinciali, Alessandro Padovani, Eugenio Pucci

Abstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Neurology and physician-assisted suicide: position of the Italian society of neurology.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Alessandra SolariNeuroepidemiology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy. alessandra.solari25@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9930-7579
Nicola TicozziDepartment of Neuroscience, IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano, 20149, Milan, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5963-7426
Giancarlo ComiDipartimento di Scienze Neuroriabilitative, Casa di Cura Igea, Milan, Italy.
Gianluigi MancardiDepartment of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8427-118X
Leandro ProvincialiProfessore Emerito di Neurologia, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy.
Alessandro PadovaniNeurology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Eugenio PucciAzienda Sanitaria Territoriale Fermo, UOC Neurologia, Fermo, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7606-7330

Funding

SIN open access
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The progress of biomedical technologies has expanded the boundaries of care, offering new treatment options and prolonging patients' survival even in conditions of great suffering and dependence. End-of-life decisions are an important topic in contemporay bioethics and physician-assisted suicide (PAS) is a still controversial topic, with Neurology at the forefront.This glossary provides a set of definitions to improve clarity and use of a consistent language in the bioethical debate on patients' autonomy, treatment limitations, palliative care, PAS, euthanasia, and related issues. The objective of the glossary, which is aligned with most recent international consensus documents and with the italian regulatory frameworks, is to clarify and harmonize the practical use of terms.The glossary, together with the companion paper outlining the position of the Italian Society of Neurology (SIN) regarding PAS, are living documents subject to revision. They can serve as a foundation for a pluralistic discussion in the debate on the ethical issues related to the care of individuals with neurological diseases characterized by poor prognosis in terms of severe disability or limited biological and biographical life expectancies, as well as their families and caregivers. An even more ambitious goal of these documents is to enhance research and inform the development of national regulation in these areas.

Indexed as

NeurologySuicide, AssistedTerminology as TopicHumansItalyPalliative CareChronic neurological illnessDefinitionsGlossaryNeuropalliative care/EthicsPhysician-assisted suicide

Identifiers

PMID40009146
PMCPMC12084260

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.