ArticleDrug delivery and translational research2025
Microneedle-mediated intracochlear injection safely achieves higher perilymphatic dexamethasone concentration than intratympanic delivery in guinea pig.
Article in Drug delivery and translational research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Interaction-aware dexterous robot for minimally invasive transcanal inner ear interventions.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Engineered Inner Ear Drug Delivery Systems for Hearing Loss Treatment.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intracochlear injection through the round window membrane (RWM) has been proposed to overcome imprecise drug delivery into the inner ear. Using a novel ultrasharp microneedle, we compared the perilymphatic dexamethasone (DEX) concentration achieved after intratympanic vs. intracochlear injection at two different time points and assessed its safety in guinea pigs. For this purpose, DEX sodium phosphate (10 mg/mL) was administered either in the right middle ear space via continuous intratympanic injection or in the right scala tympani of the cochlea with microneedle-mediated injection (1 µL at 1 µL/min) across the RWM. Both groups were evaluated at 1-hour or 3-hour time points. Perilymph from both cochleae was sampled for liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry, and bilateral cochleae were harvested for immunofluorescence. Eighteen guinea pigs were included. The mean DEX concentration was higher in the intracochlear delivery group than in the intratympanic delivery group at 1-hour time point (mean difference 67,863 ng/mL, 95% CI (8,352-127,374 ng/mL), p = 0.03). No difference was found at 3-hour time point. In every animal on both cochleae, no disruption in hair and supportive cells of the organ of Corti and utricle was observed. Significant middle ear inflammation was observed with the intratympanic delivery method compared to intracochlear. In conclusion, microneedle-mediated intracochlear injection achieves higher perilymphatic DEX concentration than the intratympanic route by a factor of 7 while preserving the cochlear architecture and inducing significantly less middle ear inflammation. In this new era of inner ear therapeutics, the potential for translational application is tangible and promising.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40009130What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.