ReviewTAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik2025
Integrating phenomic selection using single-kernel near-infrared spectroscopy and genomic selection for corn breeding improvement.
Review in TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genetic dissection of southern corn leaf blight resistance in sweet corn through genome-wide association studies and genomic selection.The plant genome · 2026Article
- Phenomics-assisted sparse testing for potato breeding.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Optimizing biomass partitioning in wheat using UAV-based hyperspectral phenomic and genomic prediction: kernel-based and machine learning approaches.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
key messagePhenomic selection using intact seeds is a promising tool to improve gain and complement genomic selection in corn breeding. Models that combine genomic and phenomic data maximize the predictive ability. Phenomic selection (PS) is a cost-effective method proposed for predicting complex traits and enhancing genetic gain in breeding programs. The statistical procedures are similar to those utilized in genomic selection (GS) models, but molecular markers data are replaced with phenomic data, such as near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS). However, the use of NIRS applied to PS typically utilized destructive sampling or collected data after the establishment of selection experiments in the field. Here, we explored the application of PS using nondestructive, single-kernel NIRS in a sweet corn breeding program, focusing on predicting future, unobserved field-based traits of economic importance, including ear and vegetative traits. Three models were employed on a diversity panel: genomic and phenomic best linear unbiased prediction models, which used relationship matrices based on SNP and NIRS data, respectively, and a combined model. The genomic relationship matrices were evaluated with varying numbers of SNPs. Additionally, the PS model trained on the diversity panel was used to select doubled haploid (DH) lines for germination before planting, with predictions validated using observed data. The findings indicate that PS generated good predictive ability (e.g., 0.46 for plant height) and distinguished between high and low germination rates in untested DH lines. Although GS generally outperformed PS, the model combining both information yielded the highest predictive ability, with higher accuracies than GS when low marker densities were used. This study highlights NIRS's potential to achieve genetic gain where GS may not be feasible and to maintain/improve accuracy with SNP-based information while reducing genotyping costs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.