Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40009087›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2025

Sustainability in radiology: position paper and call to action from ACR, AOSR, ASR, CAR, CIR, ESR, ESRNM, ISR, IS3R, RANZCR, and RSNA.

Andrea G Rockall, Bibb Allen, Maura J Brown, Tarek El-Diasty, Jan Fletcher, Rachel F Gerson, Stacy Goergen, Amanda P Marrero González, Thomas M Grist, Kate Hanneman and 5 more

Abstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Andrea G RockallDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK. a.rockall@imperial.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8270-5597
Bibb AllenInternational Society of Radiology, Reston, Virginia, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0761-290X
Maura J BrownDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5232-4494
Tarek El-DiastyRadiology Department, Urology and Nephrology Center, University of Mansoura, Mansoura, Egypt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2783-0851
Jan FletcherMonash Health, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-5661-4064
Rachel F GersonNorthwest Radiologists, Bellingham, WA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-0986-5536
Stacy GoergenMonash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9668-6809
Amanda P Marrero GonzálezDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Puerto Rico School of Medicine, San Juan, Puerto Rico.
Thomas M GristUniversity of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3279-6931
Kate HannemanDepartment of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3077-2218
Christopher P HessDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5132-5302
Evelyn Lai Ming HoParkCity Medical Centre, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4900-610X
Dina H SalamaRadiology and Medical Imaging Technology Department, Misr University for Science and Technology, October City, Egypt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4736-6723
Julia SchoenUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0679-3446
Sarah SheardDepartment of Radiology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The urgency for climate action is recognized by international government and healthcare organizations, including the United Nations (UN) and World Health Organization (WHO). Climate change, biodiversity loss, and pollution negatively impact all life on earth. All populations are impacted but not equally; the most vulnerable are at the highest risk, an inequity further exacerbated by differences in access to healthcare globally. The delivery of healthcare exacerbates the planetary health crisis through greenhouse gas emissions, largely due to combustion of fossil fuels for medical equipment production and operation, creation of medical and non-medical waste, and contamination of water supplies. As representatives of radiology societies from across the globe who work closely with industry, and both governmental and non-governmental leaders in multiple capacities, we advocate together for urgent, impactful, and measurable changes to the way we deliver care by further engaging our members, policymakers, industry partners, and our patients. Simultaneous challenges, including global health disparities, resource allocation, and access to care, must inform these efforts. Climate literacy should be increasingly added to radiology training programs. More research is required to understand and measure the environmental impact of radiological services and inform mitigation, adaptation and monitoring efforts. Deeper collaboration with industry partners is necessary to support innovations in the supply chain, energy utilization, and circular economy. Many solutions have been proposed and are already available, but we must understand and address barriers to the implementation of current and future sustainable innovations. Finally, there is a compelling need to partner with patients, to ensure that trust in the excellence of clinical care is maintained during the transition to sustainable radiology. By fostering a culture of global cooperation and rapid sharing of solutions amongst the broader imaging community, we can transform radiological practice to mitigate its environmental impact, adapt and develop resilience to current and future climate and environmental threats, and simultaneously improve access to care. KEY POINTS: Question What actions can professional societies take to improve the environmental sustainability of radiology? Findings Better understanding of resource usage in radiology is needed; action is required to address regional and global disparities in access to care which stand to be exacerbated by climate change. Clinical relevance Radiological societies need to advocate for urgent, impactful, and measurable changes to mitigate the environmental impact of radiological practice. Research and education, as well as adaptation and resilience to current and future climate and environmental threats, must be prioritized while simultaneously improving access to care.

Indexed as

Climate ChangeRadiologySustainable GrowthConservation of Natural ResourcesGlobal HealthGreenhouse EffectInternational CooperationSocieties, MedicalClimate changeHealth services accessibilityRadiologyResource allocationSustainability

Identifiers

PMID40009087
PMCPMC12350511

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.