Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40009067›Full record

ArticleeLife2025

Basal ganglia output (entopeduncular nucleus) coding of contextual kinematics and reward in the freely moving mouse.

Anil K Verma Rodriguez, Josue O Ramírez-Jarquin, Román Rossi-Pool, Fatuel Tecuapetla

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Contextual neural dynamics during time perception in the primate ventral premotor cortex.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anil K Verma RodriguezInstituto de Fisiología Celular, Departamento de Neuropatología Molecular, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico city, Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-5374-4958
Josue O Ramírez-JarquinInstituto de Fisiología Celular, Departamento de Neuropatología Molecular, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico city, Mexico.
Román Rossi-PoolInstituto de Fisiología Celular, Departamento de Neurociencia Cognitiva, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico.
Fatuel TecuapetlaInstituto de Fisiología Celular, Departamento de Neuropatología Molecular, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico city, Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9191-6553

Funding

Consejo Nacional de Humanidades, Ciencias y Tecnologías 2019/154039Consejo Nacional de Humanidades, Ciencias y Tecnologías 2022Consejo Nacional de Humanidades, Ciencias y Tecnologías 808903Consejo Nacional de Humanidades, Ciencias y Tecnologías CF-2023-I-305Dirección General de Asuntos del Personal Académico, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México IN203123Dirección General de Asuntos del Personal Académico, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México IN203420Dirección General de Asuntos del Personal Académico, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México IN226517Fundación Marcos Moshinsky Catedra 2019Wellcome Trust 220412
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The entopeduncular nucleus (EPN) is often termed as one of the output nuclei of the basal ganglia owing to their highly convergent anatomy. The rodent EPN has been implicated in reward and value coding whereas the primate analog internal Globus Pallidus has been found to be modulated by some movements and in some circumstances. In this study, we sought to understand how the rodent EPN might be coding kinematic, reward, and difficulty parameters, particularly during locomotion. Furthermore, we aimed to understand the level of movement representation: whole-body or specific body parts. To this end, mice were trained in a freely moving two-alternative forced choice task with two periods of displacement (return and go trajectories) and performed electrophysiological recordings together with video-based tracking. We found (1) robust reward coding but not difficulty. (2) Spatio-temporal variables better explain EPN activity during movement compared to kinematic variables, while both types of variables were more robustly represented in reward-related movement. (3) Reward-sensitive units encode kinematics similarly to reward-insensitive ones. (4) Population dynamics that best account for differences between these two periods of movement can be explained by allocentric references like distance to reward port. (5) The representation of paw and licks is not mutually exclusive, discarding a somatotopic muscle-level representation of movement in the EPN. Our data suggest that EPN activity represents movements and reward in a complex way: highly multiplexed, influenced by the objective of the displacement, where trajectories that lead to reward better represent spatial and kinematic variables. Interestingly, there are intertwining representations of whole-body movement kinematics with a single paw and licking variables. Further, reward-sensitive units encode kinematics similarly to reward-insensitive ones, challenging the notion of distinct pathways for reward and movement processing.

Indexed as

Basal GangliaEntopeduncular NucleusRewardAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaLocomotionMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMovementbasal gangliacodingentopeduncular nucleusmouseneuroscience

Identifiers

PMID40009067
PMCPMC11864757

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.