Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40008823›Full record

Trial reportMovement disorders clinical practice2025

Mesdopetam for the Treatment of Levodopa Induced Dyskinesia in Parkinson's Disease: A Randomized Phase 2b Trial.

Angelo Antonini, Padraig O'Suilleabhain, Fabricio Stocchi, Johanna Landström, Susanna Waters, Clas Sonesson, Joakim Tedroff

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Movement disorders clinical practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Cardiovascular pharmacology of dopaminergic agents in humans: a review.Clinical autonomic research : official journal of the Clinical Autonomic Research Society · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Angelo AntoniniDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Padua, Padova, Italy.
Padraig O'SuilleabhainDepartment of Neurology and Peter O'Donnell Jr. Brain Institute, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2981-4791
Fabricio StocchiUniversity San Raffaele Rome and Institute for Research and Medical Care (IRCCS) San Raffaele, Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5763-0033
Johanna LandströmIntegrative Research Laboratories Sweden AB (IRLAB), Göteborg, Sweden.
Susanna WatersIntegrative Research Laboratories Sweden AB (IRLAB), Göteborg, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8688-880X
Clas SonessonIntegrative Research Laboratories Sweden AB (IRLAB), Göteborg, Sweden.
Joakim TedroffIntegrative Research Laboratories Sweden AB (IRLAB), Göteborg, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe treatment of levodopa-induced dyskinesia in Parkinson's disease (PD) is a largely unmet need.

objectivesMesdopetam is a novel small molecule dopamine D3 receptor antagonist aimed for the treatment of levodopa-induced dyskinesia. This was a phase 2b study dose finding study to investigate efficacy and safety of 2.5 mg, 5 mg and 7,5 mg b.i.d. in a randomized controlled trial.

methodsPD patients with ≥2 hours of troublesome dyskinesia were randomized to placebo or mesdopetam twice daily for 12 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was change from baseline to week 12 in ON time without troublesome dyskinesia (Good ON-time) as recorded with home diaries. Secondary efficacy endpoints assessing ON phase dyskinesia were the modified UDysRS (sum of parts 1, 3 and 4) and MDS-UPDRS part 4.2.

resultsGroups did not differ in change from baseline to end of study in Good ON-time. Several secondary assessments for ON phase dyskinesia such as the modified UDysRS showed clinically relevant and statistically significant improvements for the 2.5 and 7.5 mg doses. OFF time showed dose dependent decrease with highest efficacy for the 7.5 mg dose. The adverse event profile was similar to placebo.

conclusionsIn this study mesdopetam failed to increase Good ON-time as compared to placebo. However, a statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in the prespecified secondary efficacy endpoint UDysRS warrants further investigation. Results from this dose finding study suggest 7.5 mg b.i.d. to be the preferred dose for further study.

Indexed as

Antiparkinson AgentsDopamine AntagonistsDyskinesia, Drug-InducedLevodopaParkinson DiseaseAgedDose-Response Relationship, DrugDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPhenyl EthersPropylaminesTreatment OutcomeAntiparkinson AgentsDopamine AntagonistsLevodopamesdopetamPhenyl EthersPropylaminesdopamine D3dyskinesiamesdopetamParkinson's disease

Identifiers

PMID40008823
PMCPMC12187963

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.