Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40008761›Full record

SynthesisCadernos de saude publica2025

Effect modifiers of the temperature-mortality association for general and older adults population of Brazil's metropolitan areas.

Cristiane Aschidamini, Antônio Carlos Monteiro Ponce de Leon

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Cadernos de saude publica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Cristiane AschidaminiUniversidade do Estado do Amazonas, Manaus, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0003-4110-5282
Antônio Carlos Monteiro Ponce de LeonCentro Biomédico, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0002-0704-5215

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ambient temperature effect on mortality varies between places and populations, suggesting the existence of effect modifiers for this association. This study analyzes the influence of geographic, urban, and socioeconomic factors on the ambient temperature effect on non-accidental mortality in the general and older adults population of Brazilian metropolitan areas, and on that associated with circulatory, respiratory, and other mortality in older adults. Effects of this association were estimated for each group in 42 locations using a generalized additive model combined with the nonlinear distributed lag model. A meta-analysis was then performed to estimate the effects at the national and regional levels. Meta-regression determined the influence of effect modifiers. Estimated relative risks of the temperature-mortality association varied between locations in the Brazilian territory. Heat effects on non-accidental mortality at the national level were 1.09 (95%CI: 1.04-1.15) and 1.13 (95%CI: 1.07-1.20) for the General and Older Adult groups, respectively. Cold effects were 1.26 (95%CI: 1.21-1.32) and 1.30 (95%CI: 1.24-1.36) for the General and Older Adult groups, respectively. We observed a greater effect of cold than heat in both groups. For all causes of death, effects of heat and cold were greater in the Southeast and South Brazil. Amplitude of the mean temperature was the factor that best explained the heterogeneity between locations, followed by latitude, income and schooling. Hence, implementing adaptive measures to reduce the ambient temperature effects on mortality depends on the profile of each location.

Indexed as

Cold TemperatureHot TemperatureMortalityAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBrazilCause of DeathFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRisk FactorsSocioeconomic FactorsUrban Population

Identifiers

PMID40008761
PMCPMC11863635

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.